I see the attention seeking, whingeing, money grabber [url=http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/news/a246494/rourke-to-play-gay-rugby-star-thomas.htmlis at it again[/url...

^^^^^^^^^^
Another 80k fine then!!

40k when it 'comes out' at the pictures and the same when it is released on Dvd!

And you are a moderator making these, frankly ridiculous, remarks?

I think it's time to quit now. It's getting boring and extremely tedious.

Anyone know when the appeal will take place.

Seems to have gone a bit quiet on that front.

Last I saw was the RFL confirming that, whilst Cas had signalled their intention to appeal via the press release, no appeal had actually been logged with the RFL. I'd suspect Cas were taking legal advice first re: chances of success and possible impact on franchise application (as former in-house lawyer for the RFL, Rod Findlay should know a thing or two about that). However, I'd also have thought there'd be a 14 or 28 day limit to when appeals can be lodged. 28 days would be next Tuesday. Maybe waiting for the Crusaders game to be out of the way before announcing it?

I hope that they'll teach Rourke the Welsh accent.

If it's a Hollywood film, you can bet that he'll end up being an American lad who was born in Wales and emigrated when he was a baby. (No need, then, for learning a Welsh accent). He returns to Pontefract, the South Walean mining village of his birth and then goes on to play soccer for both Pontefract and Wales, scoring the winning touchdown in the 3rd final of the All-England Superbowl 2008 (after all Wales is in England, isn't it?).

By the looks of the release below on the Super League website the appeal should already be in by now, says Cas had 15 days from date of findings (28th June?) to submit and appeal likely to be heard by end July.

[urlhttp://www.superleague.co.uk/article.php?id=18270[/url

Prepare for another shafting then, they arent going to change their minds , or apply this ruling fairly to other forms of abuse.

In short the RFL are a joke , and a pretty bad one at that

So being a moderator means I'm not entitled to an opinion? Jog on.

A statement such as

for anybody is quite ridiculous. For a holier than thou moderator, embarrassing.

But don't let that stop your pish weak defence.