Precisely. But that doesn't suit Pyemans narrative, so he won't respond with anything of relevance.

Bet your a twin

Whilst will I wager you struggled with English at school and are unable to make any accurate assumptions.

Great comeback about poor English champ

As i understand it the individuals concerned bragged about there actions on a well known social networking site, this was reported to the club and used as evidence for the banning orders.

cctv evidence can sometimes identify people but sometimes it cant, which is why despite having more cctv in this country than anywhere on earth we dont have the lowest crime rate (or anywhere near).

The club can only ban an individual when they have sufficient evidence otherwise they leave themselves open to being sued. As soon as sufficient evidence is gathered they are banned until then they cannot be banned.

Let's also consider that it's almost definitely much easier to identify someone fighting or throwing something than it is someone chanting something via CCTV.

Exactly a proving that an individual was actually chanting a specific phrase using only an image would never stand up in a court of law.

Yup, because it was a blatantly obvious attempt at irony.

I read somewhere once:

"Subtlety is an art form"

One you haven't mastered. At all.

I see the attention seeking, whingeing, money grabber rlis at it againrl...

^^^^^^^^^^
Another 80k fine then!!

40k when it 'comes out' at the pictures and the same when it is released on Dvd!