"My experience and =#FF0000expertise tells me that I will be able to procure support for the funding of the stadium and operational costs in a number of ways. =#FF0000I will seek grant funding support from avariety of sources via local government, local organisations and communities, local and national charities, regional, national and European funding schemes. TheCouncil is contributing £2m to the Trust which would be paid by the Trust toYorkcourt towards the construction costs of the stadium. =#FF0000The Trust will also seek to secure other funding support from the Sports Lottery Fund and the Football Trust"

Yeah! all the funding is in place.

You know who's words they are

I don't think he's actually realised when he posts the thread dies completely or there's a spate of off-topic posts all caused by him.

I suggest ignore listing him, it makes this place much better to read (especially when there's Chissit, Deehell etc on it too).



Now now, stop letting facts get in the way of a good rant!

There you go again; you're obsessed with me and I'm beginning to find it rather sinister.

Big Alf what is your comment regarding York Courts letter handed in at the PI confirming the stadium build is fully funded, given your assertion that it wasn't? Is Colin Mackie a liar?

Post or PM a copy and I will comment.

And Wakey fans say that Cas fans are naive and being led by the nose by RW. On the basis of someone writing a letter saying the funding is in place they are all convinced it is. I will ask the question again what is the makeup of the funding to provide this £12/16m facility.

A bit different, York Court to my knowledge dont have a long history in failing to deliver on their promises unlike RW.

Whilst I have obviously not seen a copy of the letter, I would imagine there was more substance to it, then just we confirm the stadium is fully funded (I also understand it confirmed the stadium would be built before any units as well)

Ain't got a copy, suspect it might go up on the planning portal at some stage. I was just asking your view as you seem to have some knowledge of the planning process and construction and wanted an alternative view as to whether this changed your opinion on the question mark you had over the funding.

All I have seen is the submitted written "evidence statements" which seem to confirm the opposite. Come back when you have a copy.

Pity. You appear to have some knowledge of the process and I asked you genuinely for your view, but you decide to pick up on the way my post was phrased to take the pee.

Perhaps you can provide a reasoned response as to why you think the letter is not that important or wait until it is in the public domain and give your view then?