It's just a shame Widders is going back to Australia after this season.

Rangi is a star that's true and having more options around him makes those players more dangerous too - I actually though Danny Orr was our MOTM on Saturday, he was the foil in a lot of the good things we did whether he had the ball or just set up the positions.

Goldie's tackle was garbage, you have to ban that kind of tackle, I would expect 3 games minimum, but then again only giving 5 games for biting and Rangi (originally) getting 2 games for a punch means that the rules are all over the option.
3 games would seem right to me, dangerous tackle, regardless of the outcome, which was no injury and no harm done, you can't give a sanction based on the outcome..... Even if an injury to Henderson had occurred, which I am glad it didn't cos they're both great blokes away from the field, you can't adjust the penalty to match the outcome.

I think by current interpretations it was a grapple tackle, however the 'dumping' action is more akin to a spear tackle, although it lacked the lifting beyond horizontal required for it to be deemed as such. It certainly falls into the categories of a dangerous tackle and an attack to the head which could easily cause injury. There's a sufficient breach of the rules to dish out a multiple-match ban in my opinion, without 'making a new rule up to suit' as you say. I guess we'll have to wait and see...

McGoldrick has been let of with just a caution, so the RFL can't have deemed it too serious.

Cheers for that Bonz ,Makes it a bit clearer for me ,i suppose the 'dangerous tackle' wording can cover a wide spectrum of offences

Delboy66(aye of the tigers fanzine)