Quote Tigerade="Tigerade"I just think the whole coat-of-arms thing is old fashioned. To younger supporters (thats not me by the way) the Castleford coat-of-arms means nothing. We need to attract the younger generation to the game.
'"
This coat of arms idea was put forward by an older chap. But I think it resonates with the older generation, who are generally more archaic (my grandad got offended when I said this last night).
I think the point that was being put forward in so many words was: how can a player, say from Australia, come across and represent a Tiger? I believe it succeeded a point made by Ferres that he wanted a side out on the paddock from Castleford.
The idea was that the coat of arms was not just symbolic of the club but also the town, its people and the community. How would a local player - and potentially an overseas player - feel about going into battle representing the town? It was about driving pride and players having pride in the club.
I get the point you make - and this was touched on last night. The Tigers brand is just that and for the younger generation and kids, it's more important. They identify more with a Tiger than they do the coat of arms. And when you say Tigers around Cas you know it's rugby. Just like 'The Rhinos'.
) 
