No point arguing with an unarmed man.

I'm going to save my time and efforts and let you figure it out for yourself but I suspect you'll still be here in a decade.

Nothing to figure out squire, just admit it your busted, like most things you post its just huff and puff and Iv'e called your bluff, now that's poetry look sharp or you will miss the fun bus

If you're prepared to accept incompetence and inconsistency then so be it - I guess being a Wakefield fan it's something that comes naturally to you whether you're considering players or match officials. I think the game is better than that and want to see it improve.

Is that a considered guess or just a wild guess, its a bit of a tongue in cheek comment though don't you think? coming from a Castleford fan who for quite a few years have had to accept at best mediocrity.

Iv'e only replied to 3 posters on the subject and I don't recall making any personal remark towards you, and as for Fully its clear he does not know if he's coming or going with his inconsistent posts', I can however understand your need to take him under your wing and protect him from the unscrupulous posters what come on here picking faults with his contradictory posts, especially how he looks upon you as a father figure, as for our friend allmat I did at one stage put him on my ignore list, if you look at his posts they are all aimed at me personally as is his last few posts on this thread, however don't let that get in the way of you having a cheap dig, oh and fwiw perhaps a younger or older chissitt is far too wise for you, because one things for sure my backside won't be hurting from you kicking it

There is nothing inconsistent about my posts. You just can't read, there's a difference.

talking about consistancy how was youngquest yellow carded for holding down for a shorter time than a wakey player did when we broke and were on there line, no wonder he looked confused.
As for the whole game we were very poor and could have easily thrown the game away, two of the tries we (rightly) had chalked off as forward could have easily been scored with a legal pass, but at the end of the day we got 2 pointgs with a patchwork team and 4 frontrowers out. Hopefully jackson, arundel and clarke will all be back next week.

I think that was because he did it straight after Mr Silverwood had called out both Captains for persistent infringements and issued a final warning - Youngquest left him with little choice.

Doesnt explain why cas didnt get a penalty when a wakey player held down longer, if that wasn't a penalty then there is no way that the youngquest incident should have been a penalty no matter how many warnings have been issued. This sort of inconsistency is exactly the problem most people complain about.

It is indeed, but given that your winning try resulted from a player stepping into touch and Mr McThugrick should have left the field, I don't think you've got too much to complain about.

I agree with the general point though - there really is no excuse for the kind of inconsistencies we're subjected to on a weekly basis; ironically, we seem to be two teams who have suffered more than others - our curtain raiser at MW was an absolute shambles, thanks to Mr Childs.

If your talking about the owen incident (which wasn't the wining try) he did step into touch but a penalty for a high tackle took precedence, it was a fairly harsh penalty, but owen had suffered a couple much worse earlier in the game which had gone unpunished so its swings and roundabouts.

Pathetic point scoring arguments are causing this board to lose members. I for one am thoroughly sick of it.

Firstly, how Chissitt hasn't been banned from here I don't know. Having to read his posts really degrades the forum, and I would imagine puts many genuine fans who want to join in with reasoned discussion off logging on here.
The game at the weekend seemed pretty straightforward to me. Both teams were poor defensively. The result could have gone either way. The penalty awarded to Cas for Tadulala making contact with Owen's head was correct (yes, he was ducking; yes, it was probably not intentional but the rule is clear - ANY contact with the head/neck during the tackle is a penalty even if the tackler is simply 'careless'). As foul play over-rides technical infringements (going out of play) and penalties are awarded for foul play even when the ball is dead, the referee was clearly correct to award the penalty.
However, the game could have gone either way. Castleford should count themselves lucky, and Wakefield unlucky. Maybe a draw would have been a 'fair' result but that's sport for you!