two shocking video referee decisions tonight lads..... turned the game by 12 points but typical of bentham when reffing or video reffing a team from the other side of the pennines.... and ganson cained you for doing the same as Wigan.... but good performance non the less

Wigan probably edged it but get sick and tired of their spoiling tactics and begging!! Bentham and Ganson . . . who would have thought they would favour the "bigger side"?

Can't fault the Ferres no try decision but the Carmont try was a blatant obstruction.

Quote: Fully "Can't fault the Ferres no try decision but the Carmont try was a blatant obstruction.'" yfrog.com/kfq0rpyj angle shown once... Been Tweeted by all the RL journos right now.

Quote: Fully "Can't fault the Ferres no try decision but the Carmont try was a blatant obstruction.'" yfrog.com/kfq0rpyj angle shown once... Been Tweeted by all the RL journos right now.

Not convinced on that angle. Still think the ball is balanced between his knees.

If there is doubt, then "benefit of the doubt" has to be the way. Or why have the rule? Its not "benefit of guess!"

Anyone got any angles on the blatant constant whinging from Wigan? They're a fecking disgrace to the game. I like how Ganson asked McGoldrick "are you captain?..no...well go away then" yet everytime there's a tackle, incident, anything the Wigan players are allowed to shout at him what the desision should be and he often gives it. No doubt he won't have to answer this question but it's obvious one rule for wigan and one rule for everyone else.

That angle definatley looks as though it could be given. As has been asked, why isn't that angle shown again rather than the other which didn't show anything of the ball? We like conspiracy theories in rugby league but it's funny how the super dooper cherries are losing and then a quick dose of penatly, penalty, penalty followed by obstruction ignored and decent camera angles not shown and wigan are back top where Sky wants them.

The game was a good one. Our kids did us proud tonight and nearly got the win. Shame you can't help but think had we not been playing against the Wigan tanoy announcer and his final word we might have got a result. Note to the RFL. Let's just have good games of rugby decided by rugby and not every fooker else.

If it takes 2+ mins to review a decision then that surely shows its inconclusive. If only we had a BENEFIT OF DOUBT option....oh hang on....BENTham

Very proud of the lads tonight, especially the young uns who stood up against a very strong Wigan side, the goal line defence in the last ten mins was superb.

Think Wigans defence tonight probably just deserved them the victory but who knows what may have been had the two decisions gone the way they should've.

Not surprising people are getting disillusioned with this great game when most of the time these days it doesn't seem to matter what happens on the field but when focus does actually turn to on field matters then its being ruined by the officials.

Still the future certainly looks bright as long as the idiots running the game don't ruin that as well

You were well cheated tonight if I was a Cas fan I'de be well ed off! Bentham is a disgrace! from the first angle the ball deinitely looked down, after it was on his legs.At least benifit of the doubt

It seems to me as though the video ref looks for reasons not to give a try if its a club outside of the big 4 and looks for reasons to give a try if its a big 4 club. Not the first time its happened this year and im sure it wont be the last.

I think Wigan justed edged it but a very good performance from our lads night. Some of our defence was outstanding at times. Thought Davies had a decent game but Emmitt was outstanding again, hope the injuries not too bad.

Seriously?

The obstruction decision you have a point on, but as the picture "being tweeted by journos" shows, the ball is clearly held up. THAT was absolutely the right decision. It never got to ground. Having said that, I was expecting "Benefit of the doubt" to go up on the screen, even though it would have been blatantly wrong.

As for whinging, how about Mr Emmit? Dummy spitting worse than Graham on show tonight.

Bentham made some right howlers of decisions tonight, but he got more wrong against Wigan than he did against Castleford. Overall, he wasn't too bad.

That Davies is dirty, isn't he... he'll be facing the disciplinary for about 3 different things.

i saw jake having a laugh with the opposition players not whinging you need to take those cherry and white glasses off and you should know a whinger when you see one

as for Davies doubt he will get called up may get a caution but i would be surprised if he gets that

Typo corrected

I would disagree, dont actually think that picture shows anything conclusively. I think the ball is down (maybe im wrong), it wasn't given so it doesn't really matter now.

Emmit does whinge a bit but he's far from the worst, he has been pulled up about this before. Put in a solid shift tonight until his injury.

I wouldn't call Davies a dirty player, i'd call it commitment. He did make a couple of bad tackles (if they can be called that) but he's took a big step up in class tonight and done well, plays with a bit of passion and thats what we like to see at Cas.

The picture only shows it at that split second time, where are the ones leadoing up to it ? , The wigan players were trying to pull him back all the time so this clip could have been at that point, its inconclusive and should have been given the benefit,