Not quite as angry as you being a Leyther but I agree with all comments. If that Harlequins bobbins was given and the Watts 'try' it just shows there are no two refs playing to the same rule book.
Hard done to tonight.

they give the decisions as they see fit didnt see all the game but i agree thought the last try decision was shocking but it got me 4 points on the rlfans predictor so im happy at least

Cas were ROBBED..What planet is Ganson on... THAT WAS A CLEAR KNOCK ON

What about KRs first try given by the video ref dont the rules clearly state the ball must be played by the foot whats point in even having rules!!!!!

Watts didn't think he'd scored.

I don't think Cas were robbed and it's a shame that the game will be talked about for a couple of decisions rather than a great game of rugby for the neutral. I think the decisions evened out over the game, especially as two of the Cas tries came from forward passes. Well done HKR.

But 3 KR trys came from

That's all in your opinion, as I've said a few of your tries were questionable as well. At the end of the day you lost as HKR out battled you at the end and Cas bombed too many chances, now you're trying to blame the ref.

I'm a neutral so no horse in this race but where did you get these from? I know what you mean about the incorrect play the ball but, as Stevo & Eddie said, incorrect play the balls litter superleague at present so Ganson would not have been justified in denying a try on that basis. If the obstruction is what I think it is, then it simply wasn't obstruction. Your player tackled the dummy runner and that was very clear. I don't know about the offside as there wasn't an offside possibility discussed and I didn't notice an offside during any of HKR's tries.

The last try was a bit of a strange one in that I didn't know such an interpretation of knock on (or rather not a knock on) existed. I automatically thought that final try was a knock on but it would seem not. Something to do with it not having hit the ground before being grounded, or something (like I said, a strange one).

From a neutral's POV a draw would have been the fairest result as both teams made silly errors during different patches in the match, both teams had varying defences at different times in the match and both teams played some extremely entertaining rugby league at most times during the match.

I always look forward to watching Cas as they always, always produce some great attacking football. But your guys really do have to get over letting sound leads go at home! It must be so frustrating as a Cas fan to watch that happen!

Understatement of all time!

There was no dummy runner, Watts stepped forwards from the play the ball into the Cas defensive line creating a gap for the dummy half to go over and score in, the offside was Cockayne's try the player directly to the left of Dobson was a metre or so in front when the kick was placed. As for the incorrect play the ball, sure it goes un-noticed most of the time, but the video ref CHECKED it and still decided it was legal, when it should have been a penalty on review.

Yes we may have been robbed. But I tell you who I blame. Matterson. Get your coat what sort of a coach sends his team out with 16 men and has a young hungry kid sat on bench for full 80 minutes without using him. its hard enough in this league without having to do it a man light.

GO NOW PLEASE

Ganson WOULD have been justified in denying it on that basis as that is one of the rules.

As they say rules are meant to be broken and rugby league officials excell at it when it suits their agenda.

I'm absolutely disgusted. I don't really want to watch a sport that's as bent as this.

I'm happy to accept losses. I'm happy to admit if we were poor, which we were tonight at times. But I cannot accept decisions like that.