Just to add to the above. If such a clause, as is customary with most professional sports contracts, is in Solomona's contract, and Sale did not obtain permission (which based off of Castlefords statement of 'we don't know what has been going on for 3 weeks, seem pretty obvious) then Sale are complicit in this. Sale would have needed to confirm with Castleford that they accept any costs incurred from an injury, and Cas would have had to agree.

For those Sale fans saying they do not see what we have done wrong, this would be exactly what they have done wrong.

And yes, I am the Sale fan on that board who pointed out what the club has done wrong, and all my fellow Sale fans seem to disagree.

What's the news on Sly Solomona ?

Have I missed summat ?

I believe it was the judge that adjourned the case to give both sides an opportunity to agree a settlement, Sale all along have said they have done nothing wrong and owe Cas nothing so the judge must think otherwise.

Sale have been remarkably quiet these last few months.

rumours both sides (lawyers)were to meet for the last time over a week ago heard nothing since, maybe they are close to an agreement maybe they are miles apart and are now awaiting for a court date, I would expect some kind of announcement soon.

It was said in the union press that it's back in court early May.

Back to court today.. www.totalrl.com/castleford-head- ... -solomona/

Back to court today.. www.totalrl.com/castleford-head- ... -solomona/

Now listed for a hearing in Nov\Dec www.telegraph.co.uk/rugby-union/ ... ng-trial2/

Now listed for a hearing in Nov\Dec www.telegraph.co.uk/rugby-union/ ... ng-trial2/