Quote: Junglefever "I know we are not the richest club in the league and we tend to spend within our means, but what I find interesting is this "Lack of Ambition" comment, constantly appearing. The club keep telling us they are looking for new investors, but what investor is going to invest in a club that currently has no ambition to move forward?'"
There is certainly no lack of ambition from the fans but there is from the BOD. The ownership model at SL level has changed dramatically over the last couple of seasons. We are probably the last SL club run by a BOD that answers to its shareholders. Most clubs now are owned and run by a sole owner.
As it stands now (and thanks to Jack Fulton) we are just surviving. He has kept us in operation for 20+ years and without him we wouldn’t have a club to support. Unfortunately “just surviving” isn’t enough in today’s SL. The definition of ambition in SL translates to the facility of pumping cold hard cash into a hobby of which you will never see again – granted there are a few exceptions like Leeds and Wigan who prove it can be made into a profitable exercise – but most make losses year on year and are happy to go along with this until they get fed up and move to another hobby.
We haven’t moved with the times, the stadium issue is an albatross around our neck and there is no way we can apply for another licence on the back of more promises.
There are certain instances recently that have made me think that Castleford Tigers as a club lacks ambition to the point that we have gave up completely. The constant employment of our head coach is just one of those instances. I won’t list them all here – you will know the rest.
Our decline has even made me ask the following:-
1. Have we already been told we don’t figure in the next licence period?
2. Have we been told plans have been made for a 2 tier SL with Tigers in SL2?
3. Have our BOD accepted that we cannot compete at SL level and are already planning for life outside the elite?