Quote: bren2k "Ask yourself this question - Cas and Wakey play each other; Justin Poore takes Chase out with a full-blooded hit, that *may* have involved contact with the head and leaves him dazed and confused on the floor. The referee is unsure what happened, so puts the incident on report to be looked at later.'"
It wasn't put on report, the only signal Tim Roby gave was scrum, Castleford head & feed. Roby was also stood no more than 3 yards away from the incident and had a clear view of it, so are the committee questioning the ability of one of their full time officials?
Quote: bren2k "Do you (and your fellow pitchfork wielders) say, "fair enough - it was a big hit," or do you expect Poore to be called to account for that tackle, so the disciplinary committee can have a look at it and hear his side of the story? '"
If there's a worse challenge in the same week let off for a "legitimate" attempt at a tackle then it would be daft, just as this is now.
Does Chase also fall face first into the challenge due to breaking a previous tackle attempt?
Quote: bren2k "Calm down dear - this is about player welfare, not persecuting poor little innocent Rangi.'"
If it's all about player welfare then:
Why is Con Mika not charged nor asked to "explain himself" - penalty given during the game
Why is Jamie Peacock not charged nor asked to "explain himself" - penalty given during the game
Why is Justin Poore not charged or even cited for standing on Withers head - no penalty given during the game and rightly so
But if it's all about "player welfare" then all those cases would have been called up.
Now stop trolling, as per usual.