Nowhere does it say we won't. That's an assumption you've made.

If you do actually read it, it says it won't be ready for the first game of the 2013 season, which does indicate it will be ready for mid-2013 or the 2014 season.

I know what it says, and all it indicates is that you won't start 2013 there. There is no mention of when it be ready, if it ever will. After all the confident statements Richard Wright has made over the last few years, I'd be concerned that this latest ones seems to be dragging the process on even further. It is only my opinion, but I think one new stadium is optimistic for our district, and that two so close together is too unrealistic. My gut feeling is neither will happen within the timescales required for the next round of franchises.

If you read it again, you'll also note that it's Opus who have wrote it regarding the timescale, not RW.

Fully im a Cas fan im not into my grounds bigger than yours, my dads better than yours, if Wakey get their ground they will, all the why for's why nots concerning who owns what are irrelevant, This statement is old hat offers nothing new that people don't know about. oh except the fact that theirs another delay. sorry mate but until im sat in the seat in the stand at GH then i will believe its happened, im more than happy to stay at WR and follow CAS whichever league they are in

It appears to me that the possibility of delays now could be a problem for cas, other sites, other supermarkets, objectors etc etc.
What it doesn't prove though is that it won't still happen, and anyone who says another supermarket or two cant be developed at once or in close proximity clearly doesn't understand the power of the supermarkets.
Look at Wakefield, Tesco's sniff around mention they want the old Sainsburys site, Sainsburys kick off and Wakefield ends up with a new Tesco and ANOTHER Sainsburys all within a mile of the city centre, on the same road, and i would argue that the people of Wakefield don't need either.