Miles Greenwood couldn't tackle a good dinner , has a bit of speed , never rated him at Leigh, however I still hope Fax do okay as I like to see a happy Halifaxjohn and Bentley man.

I did I think he is a very good player.

I would go the same only difference is I would have Mennell start at Hooker and Maneely coming off the bench. I think Holden and Maneely are too alike so I think maybe one will miss out. Nice having 4 props in the team capable of doing 3/4 of the game which could make a big difference.

The main word being DID I was glad when we showed him the door , he can't tackle but neither could Fieldhouse, the meeting of the Fax pack and the Leigh pack should be good , I can't wait .

Happiness is my middle name, Charlie, and whatever Miles can't eat I will help him.

Good to see the focus turning to the players and the RL, here's my two penneth for what it's worth, without knowing how pre-seasons going?

Greenwood (class act despite what the clown from Lancashire says)

Brown
Tyrer (gets the nod just due to goal kicking ability)
Saltonstall
Saxton

Place
Johnstone

Ambler
Mennell
Calahane

Manning (full 80 mins)
Divorty (full 80 mins)
Murrell

Subs
Maneeley
Tangata
Moore
Taylor

For me it's going to a little nerve wracking to see what standard our Aussies are at, let's hope its the one positive thing we can take from the last regime. Would also be great to see Taylor, Saltonstall and Maneeley make names for themselves.

Looking forward to it.

mine

1.Greenwood
2.Saltonstall
3.Tyrer
4.Taylor
5.Brown
6.Place
7.Johnston
8.Moore
9.Holden
10.Ambler
11.Manning
12.Divorty
13.Murrell (c)

14.Maneely
15.Cahalane
16.Tangata
17.Bracek

think Murrell at 13 gives us more options when kicking in general play and better with ball in hand as well

agree

Why couldn't KH see that Murrell wasn't a half back? Although tbf Murrell picked himself in the halves.

Big season for Murrell.When he first arrived thought he was quality and first name on teamsheet,by end of last season i didn't care whether he was in team or not.Hope the
new regime has envigorated him.

Yes, I agree with that.

My only concern playing Murrell at loose forward is that he might be too small if we come up against a big pack. Maybe wiser having a forward there when we play on narrow fields.

Yes Ross Divorty.

I'm sure I read that RM saw Murrell as a 6 rather than a 13, knowing me though it could have been the other way round, but either way there are options.

Your right. He did. Hopefully he will change his mind though. Need to see how good Mat Place is first.