Is that factual ? thought you could dr/loan 5 and you're getting 7.

AFAIK You can loan/dual reg as many as you want (if you dual reg you technically get access to the entire squad), but only 5 can play on a match day.

The question for me would be What does Jordan Lilley have to do to get in whinos first team?

The lad has paid his dues (Hunslet and Fev) in the championship, showed what he can do in SL last year yet BM still doesn't see him in his 1st 17

Talented player bfd have got there, ripped us to death when he was at hunslet

Agreed, thought this would be his year, seems to be shouldering an unfair bulk of the blame for last season's poor performance.

So the situation as I understand it is that the Bulls are playing pretty much rent free at Odslum courtesy of the RFL? Any chance they can also pay our rent? Would then have maybe allowed for us to have kept Manning.

Even playing field my .

Exactly, and the rest.

What happens if Fev want him for DR again...it's a farcial situation.

That can't happen until his loan is complete and he goes back to Leeds. And the loan has to last a minimum of 4 weeks unless mutually terminated as I understand it.

How do you feel about that having a DR agreement ?

As I have stated on here and other forums I dislike it. I understand why we (Fev) choose to use it though I wish we hadn't. For me it is designed for the benefit of SL clubs. I would like all the clubs in the championship and championship 1 to tell the RFL to shove it, which was proposed by the likes of our chairman and to be fair to him Tubbs at the outset, but I just don't see that happening now.



For me all pro clubs should have to run a reserve side (whether that be U21 or an A team as was), otherwise we will starve our sport of future talent. For this I applaud what Fax have done the last 12 months or so, and would like to see my club go back to running an academy.



Personally I will still support my team despite DR, not because I think it is good for RL, however I understand anyone that chooses to take a stand and will not go to the games because of it.

No I mean't how do feel about the loaning of 4 of your potential DR players to another club ?

Not our players so don't really have any feelings about it. Though personally I'd rather have players that are signed up for Fev in the Fev team, if this is more likely with the 4 going on loan at Bradford I guess then that is a good thing.

Bradford are desperately short on players, so good luck to them.

The bigger deal here for me is, "is it good for RL that having gone into liquidation Bradford have not had to start again in Champ 1"? I understand why it ended up that they had to stay in the championship (see my post here: [urlhttp://www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php?/topic/292963-bradford-bulls/&page=6[/url. However had the RFL been more proactive back in early November, maybe we could have seen Whitehaven in the Championship and Bradford in Champ 1.


As an aside FWIW out of the 4 I would only see Lilley as being a likely candidate for DR in the Fev team currently.