Quote: Fully "Congratulations for posting a small summary, which reinforces what I've said.
"are to a degree" and "proposed". To a degree implies that not all of the application was based on a new stadium but we illustrated the projections that we felt we could achieve should the new stadium go ahead.
In fact, why don't we look at the good of Cas - our youth production? Our limited reliance on overseas players in comparison to other clubs...oh, and the fact we haven't got into financial issues unlike Bradford, Wakefield, London and Salford..
Never mind. Apologies for the thread drift but this 'you lied'+'stadia misconception' really gets on my goat from people who haven't a foggiest.'"
While I am in no way suggesting that Leigh, or Fax for that matter are in a position to enter SL, you must see the frustration of the lower tiers, your application was judged not purely against Wheldon Rd, but against a proposal, while the RFL refused to accept an 80% completed LSV on the day the decision was made, they had even toured the stadium at 65% a couple of months earlier
No you didnt ' lie ' , but that part of your application should have been removed, similarily with others
The answer to all this? No idea
