FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
  
FORUMS > Halifax Panthers > council statement.
171 posts in 12 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach5865No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200420 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Mar 2019Nov 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
10674.jpg
:10674.jpg



Quote: Bubba "I agree. Maybe thats why FCHT supporters are a bit more wary about the stadium falling into the hands of a private owner because we are more aware and maybe even more paranoid about future problems given our past. But why would the Town directors need to fund them this season? There was almost £200k in the bank on the previous financial return. If they are having to fund the club the I would be concerned, but there is no proof that they are or even need to.

Not sure on our membership numbers. They are certainly not as high as we would like but we have been pretty dormant over the last few years. I read on here that I had supposedly walked away from the Trust. That never happened!

Councillor Roger Taylor is the chair of our board which has 6 members. We are members of Supporters Direct, who have been a great help this past month or so - aren't Fax Trust still members of SD? In fact I have been invited to speak at a rugby league Supporters Direct event in January about the ACV - will Fax Trust be in attendance?

We have over £10k in the bank, hold an annual meeting and submit our annual financial returns to the FCA. We didnt get off to the best of starts with the club owners but there is dialogue now.

I know my name is mud on here so I want to try justify why we have done what we have. From our point of view it was never a football vs rugby issue. Of course there would have been FCHT supporters who would have been delighted had it been David Bosomworth trying to buy the Shay. But I would like to think that the majority who have been against any sale, have been because of the future risks to both clubs.

When it became apparent, or at least according to Tony Abbot, that a sale of the Shay was weeks away I think everyone would agree that it hadn't been done the right way. We are not talking about a plot of land for building a little garage. We are talking about a sport stadia which has huge emotion attached to it and home to the towns two main sporting clubs.

There had been absolutely no transparency and the only way to at least ensure if any sale was to be made it would be done to the benefit of the Calderdale taxpayer was to apply for the ACV. The Trust, as a Industrial & Provident Society, was the perfect vehicle to put in the application. There are other ways and other groups that could have done it but it made sense for the Trust to take the lead.

I dont know Tony Abbott personally but know people who do and there isnt a bad word said about him. However, managed better, with a bit more thought than bravado, he could have taken everyone along with his ideas. But by trying to do it behind the back of the football club was always only going to end in tears.

You mentioned that it was the protest march which led to the council deciding to complete the East Stand. I am not sure if you really believe that or not but the protest march was organised when the council talked about selling the Shay to a private owner - about 4 years prior to work on the East Stand beginning. Ian Griffiths was the main organiser, I was involved as were others from both clubs because we understood the risks that came with the Shay falling into the hands of an individual or organisation other than the Council.

My interest in the future of the Shay stretches back before this. I was part of the joint working party of HTST and Fax Trust which put together the document which started the discussion leading to the Shay Stadium Trust. The others were Peter Lassey, Joanne Cardwell and from Fax Trust Adrian Vaughan, Andrew Hamer and Robin Smith.
Not getting not long never ending debates but I will correct you on two points and am puzzled why you won't say what the Halifax Town Supporters Trust membership is, why?
Firstly Tony Abbott and other Halifax RLFC Directors have assured us that he DID speak to the Board of FC Halifax Town and why wouldn't he as he knows they have to be involved as one of the tow major tenants. As for Halifax RLFC Supporters Trust supporting Council ownership and its ultimate investment it was a different scenario, then there was no potential buyer who was keen to keep the Shay for sport the fear was that it would be closed and sold off (although my own belief is the Shay is that it is not as lucrative as most people think Broad Street need public money to make it happen why would the Shay work for anything?), the Reactiv situation is different he does want to keep it for sport. The Councils investment was obviously very welcome and again that was then this is now, since that time the Council is under huge budget cuts and the fact that the Shay will not get any more money invested in it as it is losing money cannot be disputed, your dream of a solution via the Council won't ever happen.
That is mine and most other fans fears and is NOTHING to do with Tony Abbott being the messiah as he aint he is a businessman with a POTENTIAL vision for a Shay that will be improved an will be commercially viable, is that so bad?

RankPostsTeam
International Star4572
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 201014 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Part quote.
I agree. Maybe thats why FCHT supporters are a bit more wary about the stadium falling into the hands of a private owner because we are more aware and maybe even more paranoid about future problems given our past.

The thing is Bubba it's not just FCHT supporters many Fax fans agree with the essence of the concerns about private ownership, once it goes there the risk, no matter how good the intentions intially must be higher than the local authority controling it, I know I do.

However some of the things done and said by a section of the Town group in following up on the concerns were so over the top and extreme it compromised everything else you were trying to say and do, do you not see there is a right and wrong way to go about things and if they were done the right way you would have had support from some on here as well!!

The ball is and has always been with the council and whether the decide to sell or not.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman5612
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

Loving the hypocrisy of some.:



Why are you puzzled that I dont know what our membership is? I dont look after membership. I do know we once had about 340 but nowhere near that now.

Of course Tony Abbott did speak to FCHT. Do you think the Halifax Town owners were in favour?

You are missing the point. Tony Abbott could potentially be the best thing since sliced bread. But what happens should his company fail? What happens when he dies (it comes to us all)? What happens when he has had enough? Not even you can answer that with any authority. And please dont mention covenants because I have found out over the last few weeks that these are pretty much worthless!

There has to be some sort of compromise which suits everyone and I am certain that there is one.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman5612
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

Loving the hypocrisy of some.:



Quote: faxcar "Part quote.
I agree. Maybe thats why FCHT supporters are a bit more wary about the stadium falling into the hands of a private owner because we are more aware and maybe even more paranoid about future problems given our past.

The thing is Bubba it's not just FCHT supporters many Fax fans agree with the essence of the concerns about private ownership, once it goes there the risk, no matter how good the intentions intially must be higher than the local authority controling it, I know I do.

However some of the things done and said by a section of the Town group in following up on the concerns were so over the top and extreme it compromised everything else you were trying to say and do, do you not see there is a right and wrong way to go about things and if they were done the right way you would have had support from some on here as well!!

The ball is and has always been with the council and whether the decide to sell or not.'"


In fairness there has been some pretty rotten comments on here too. But that is playground stuff; I would prefer to try have proper debate.

And yes, of course it was the councils decision whether to sell or not. Tony Abbott did his bit in trying to persuade them to do as so whereas we did our bit to convince them that they shouldnt. Fair game.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4914
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2024Aug 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
Others/grunt.gif
been around here long time, thought would start posting...........:Others/grunt.gif



Quote: Bubba "In fairness there has been some pretty rotten comments on here too. But that is playground stuff; I would prefer to try have proper debate.

And yes, of course it was the councils decision whether to sell or not. Tony Abbott did his bit in trying to persuade them to do as so whereas we did our bit to convince them that they shouldnt. Fair game.'"

i have always found that could have a reasoned proper debate with you. but some (one definately) have gone way too far with comments and more than playground comments.

RankPostsTeam
International Star4572
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 201014 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: Bubba "In fairness there has been some pretty rotten comments on here too. But that is playground stuff; I would prefer to try have proper debate.

And yes, of course it was the councils decision whether to sell or not. Tony Abbott did his bit in trying to persuade them to do as so whereas we did our bit to convince them that they shouldnt. Fair game.'"


Ah so unlike your mate SG you accept they did consider selling then.

"Your bit." The comments made by some of the Town group were well beyond the playground and more inline with despicable thugs.

Personel character attacks on the man, his family, twitter accounts, his charitable works, comparing him to a child killer and many more.

Hardly a platform or invitation to "proper debate", this type of high morals good intention talk in view of your actions is the definition of a contradiction in terms.

If that is "fair game" then once again, in print you have shown what you are really about and what moral standards you have.

This "persuasion" was motivated by his connection to the rugby club and nothing more, the rest of the concerned retoric was a smoke screen because you and yours don't want the rugby club at the Shay at all.

You claim it to be a community assett just as long as the community is FCHT and everbody else, rugby supporters, rate payers are surplus baggage.

Tony Abbott asked if he could complete one section of the ground that has been left unfinished for years and will remain unfinished for a few more years.

It was the council who opened up the possibilty of more to which he responded in the positive because he had the best interests of the two clubs at heart which was never malicious or with any other agenda, as it turns out, the recent halt in proceedings could be the best thing that has happened to him.

YOUR COVERS BLOWN, YOUR THE TAYLORS SHOP IN FRONT OF THE GANGSTERS HIDEOUT.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach5865No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200420 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Mar 2019Nov 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
10674.jpg
:10674.jpg



Quote: Bubba "Why are you puzzled that I dont know what our membership is? I dont look after membership. I do know we once had about 340 but nowhere near that now.

Of course Tony Abbott did speak to FCHT. Do you think the Halifax Town owners were in favour?

You are missing the point. Tony Abbott could potentially be the best thing since sliced bread. But what happens should his company fail? What happens when he dies (it comes to us all)? What happens when he has had enough? Not even you can answer that with any authority. And please dont mention covenants because I have found out over the last few weeks that these are pretty much worthless!

There has to be some sort of compromise which suits everyone and I am certain that there is one.'"


Cos you are good at throwing figures around when it suits yet cannot tell us how many fans are members of the Halifax Town Supporters Trust, I wonder why???
As for Tony Abbotts company failing its you who have missed the point as he has stated in public that the Shay will be a separate stadium company which would not be affected if Reactive went bust.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach6698No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Mar 2017Feb 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
46669_1419854573.jpg
And Behold, a pale horse. And on his back his name was death. The weekend starts on a Monday.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_46669.jpg



Not being a twitterite so can only say what I have been told.
The luddites have achieved their secondary object, I believe Mr Abbott is not interested in a partnership and will therefore withdraw from his plan for the Shay.
Perhaps all the bile and filth posted on various networks (sanctioned by the Town Chairman "We must resist this proposal by every means available" helped him make up his mind.
All the bubberites will go to bed now and look at Bubba's picture on their ceiling, but hold on, their main objective has not been met, Mr Abbott will not walk away from Halifax Rugby League Football Club.
Mind you, it can't be much fun when your season ends at 5.45 November 9th.
icon_biggrin.gifOH:

RankPostsTeam
International Star119No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 201311 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2013Nov 2013LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: faxcar "1. So the council were now selling again at a give away price but TA could not afford it so that's why it is now not for sale. SuperGeoff logic again just to try and slag TA off.

I have had a word with my doctor about getting my intelligence levels to the same as yours and he has said that by removing my entire brain and leaving my skull entirely empty would be the way to go.

A simpleton can anly give a simple answer including mutiple contradictions to the same question but they wouldn't know and the question is never answered.

Any BOD that would sell players rather than keep them lacks finances and ambition, hence the term.
"A selling club" For them progress will be limited and they will soon find there level before slowly slipping back down.

Your not sure on anything as you change your story everytime you post so no suprises there.

2. I have no football agenda but I want Town to win every game and do as well as they can irrespective of what anybody else does, rugby, soccer or otherwise.
In fact I have suported them since I was a young lad even when the rest of my mates chose Leeds or Huddersfield.

My own club being in the red, you clearly do not understand how finances work and again are reading what you want to read into balance sheets just to slag someone off again.

Have you not heard of the term "credit" which means to manage funds so you pay them when it is best to so without defaulting and getting into debt.

Part of the entire financial system world wide is built on credit and you are always paying catch up but I don't expect you to understand.'"


1. Nope but that is what you seem to think. The talks were had, the sale never happened. Full stop.

In what way does that makes Halifax Town a selling club? They sold one player to allow the player to reach his ambition and potential (currently in the play-offs in the championship) and the money raised allowed a more rounded squad to be built. Obviously you won't see it that way because it doesn't fit your ideals. Is it not a mark of the football club developing a player worth vast amounts of money?

2. So there are no financial worries then? The fact that 100k was pumped into the cub by its benefactor means nothing? I see you and your cronies have backed down on the claim of Messers Ham and Bosomworth putting vast amounts of money into the club.

RankPostsTeam
International Star119No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 201311 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2013Nov 2013LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: swifty62 "i have always found that could have a reasoned proper debate with you. but some (one definately) have gone way too far with comments and more than playground comments.'"


Agreed Swifty. Always found you have something intelligent to add to the debate icon_lol.gif

RankPostsTeam
International Star119No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 201311 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2013Nov 2013LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: HalifaxCougar "Supergeoff wont be watching the shaymen today, fact.'"

Had a fantastic day. Still on the way home but a top day out regardless of the result.

RankPostsTeam
International Star4572
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 201014 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: SuperGeoff "1. Nope but that is what you seem to think. The talks were had, the sale never happened. Full stop.

In what way does that makes Halifax Town a selling club? They sold one player to allow the player to reach his ambition and potential (currently in the play-offs in the championship) and the money raised allowed a more rounded squad to be built. Obviously you won't see it that way because it doesn't fit your ideals. Is it not a mark of the football club developing a player worth vast amounts of money?

2. So there are no financial worries then? The fact that 100k was pumped into the cub by its benefactor means nothing? I see you and your cronies have backed down on the claim of Messers Ham and Bosomworth putting vast amounts of money into the club.'"


1. The talks were had (held, not had thicko) the sale never happened, what sale it was never up for sale according to you, so what did they talk about then.

There a selling club because they sold the star player the only one anybody would pay anything for at the time, this sets a precedent and no doubt they will do the same if another player shows any potential.

They let him go to another club to reach his ambition and potential?

That must mean he could not achieve either with Town then.

350k for Vardy wasn't it, described by you as "a player worth vast amounts of money" and according to what you have just said it was pumped back into the club for a more rounded squad.

The next line you talk of people on here backing down on claims that "Messers Ham and Bosomworth putting vast amounts of money into the club" as if they hadn't. icon_lol.gif

Again which is it then Einstein.

Obviously you can't even work out that 350k is 3 and a half times greater than 100k so with your logic Town must have 3 and a half times the financial worries then.

Can you not put a single post togther without contradicting yourself, it's embarrasing.

RankPostsTeam
International Star119No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 201311 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2013Nov 2013LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: faxcar "1. The talks were had (held not had thicko) the sale never happened, what sale it was never up for sale according to you, so what did they talk about then.

There a selling club because they sold the star player the only one anybody would pay anything for at the time, this sets a precedent and no doubt they will do the same if another player shows any potential.

They let him go to another club to reach his ambition and potential?

That must mean he could not achieve either with Town then.

350k for Vardy wasn't it, described by you as "a player worth vast amounts of money" and according to what you have just said it was pumped back into the club for a more rounded squad.

The next line you talk of peple on here backing down on claims that "Messers Ham and Bosomworth putting vast amounts of money into the club" as if they hadn't.
Not at all, there were plenty of other players in that squad worth money. The money from the Vardy sale was money which the club earned from selling a player. You're right, it is mathematically impossible for Vardy to have been promoted four times in the two season since leaving the Shay. Halifax did not need to sell the player, but allowing the player to reach the heights to which he deserves without holding his career back is something that goes a long way in the game. It does not make the club a selling club as you imply, and as would make a club who need to sell. We simply take good players from lower leagues and aid their development.

Once again, the club did not need the Vardy money, but the 400k+ raised from the sale of Vardy was money put into the club that was raised BY THE CLUB. Not put into the club via the pocket of a businessman. As has already bee pointed out to you, the club is self sufficient. According to you Ham and Bosomworth should have kept the money for themselves rather than allowing it to go to the club, otherwise they're bankrolling us. 38k as start up spread between two directors and a chairman.

It may well surprise you that sportsmen don't play for their club for the love of the game. Players at lower levels such as the Kingstone's Press Championship and the Skrill Premier use the clubs as a springboard, and if it achieves success and finance on the way then that is a bonus for all involved.

I'm sure one day you'll put a post together free of glaring spelling mistakes and accurate factual information. That way you'll less like a wet otter.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman5612
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

Loving the hypocrisy of some.:



Quote: faxcar "Ah so unlike your mate SG you accept they did consider selling then. '"


Of course they considered selling. I think it was more council officers though doing the pushing than councillors. The majority of councillors knew nothing about it and were concerned at how it had been handled.

Quote: faxcar ""Your bit." The comments made by some of the Town group were well beyond the playground and more inline with despicable thugs.
Personel character attacks on the man, his family, twitter accounts, his charitable works, comparing him to a child killer and many more. '"


As I said, some supporters on both sides have made inappropriate comments.

Quote: faxcar "Hardly a platform or invitation to "proper debate", this type of high morals good intention talk in view of your actions is the definition of a contradiction in terms.
If that is "fair game" then once again, in print you have shown what you are really about and what moral standards you have. '"


My comment about 'fair game' was in reference to Tony Abbott fighting for his case for buying the ground and HTST fighting the case for the council not selling. I dont think you will find comments made by any HTST board members where they have been "inlne with despicable thugs" as you like to put it.

Quote: faxcar "This "persuasion" was motivated by his connection to the rugby club and nothing more, the rest of the concerned retoric was a smoke screen because you and yours don't want the rugby club at the Shay at all.
You claim it to be a community assett just as long as the community is FCHT and everbody else, rugby supporters, rate payers are surplus baggage. '"


Your paranoia is reaching a new level. I am happy to debate with you but please dont turn it ridiculous.

Quote: faxcar "Cos [sic] you are good at throwing figures around when it suits yet cannot tell us how many fans are members of the Halifax Town Supporters Trust, I wonder why??? '"


I have thrown figures about which have been relevant to the debate. I wonder why this is so important to you. Is it because you believe HTST only represents its membership? Having not heard one FCHT supporter say they were in favour of a sale of the Shay I would like to think our actions represented the whole of the FCHT support base.

Quote: faxcar "As for Tony Abbotts company failing its you who have missed the point as he has stated in public that the Shay will be a separate stadium company which would not be affected if Reactive went bust. '"


Come on! You are an intelligent guy. You're not thinking properly about this.

RankPostsTeam
International Star778No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 201312 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2019Jan 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

Soon be Monday.:



Quote: SuperGeoff "Had a fantastic day. Still on the way home but a top day out regardless of the result.'"


You can have my ticket stub so you can pretend you went to all your friends.

171 posts in 12 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin
171 posts in 12 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


4.67138671875:5
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
2m
Pre Season - 2025
mwindass
142
16m
IMG scores
Butcher
261
23m
Game - Song Titles
Wanderer
40565
23m
Memorable Games
RockNRolla
36
24m
BORED The Band Name Game
Wanderer
63058
25m
Film game
Wanderer
5264
42m
Call for funds
Hudd-Shay
183
49m
Planning for next season
satanicmills
173
49m
Squad 2025
Ilkley Fax
29
Recent
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Marcus's Bic
3739
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
13s
New Players
RfE
115
15s
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Marcus's Bic
3739
20s
Planning for next season
satanicmills
173
21s
Garry Schofield
karetaker
12
22s
IMG Score
Pyrah123
66
24s
Squad 2025
Ilkley Fax
29
32s
Recruitment rumours and links
Or thane
3541
32s
Gary Scofield
Rugby Raider
8
40s
NRL Kick Off Rules
stpatricks
7
44s
Rumours and signings v9
NSW
28868
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
A Year to Remember
Zig
1
TODAY
2025 Annual
JamieRobinso
1
TODAY
2025 KIT Thread
Sadfish
1
TODAY
NRL Kick Off Rules
stpatricks
7
TODAY
Garry Schofield
PopTart
6
TODAY
Out of contract 2025
Wires71
8
TODAY
Gary Scofield
Rugby Raider
8
TODAY
Joe Phillips
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Andy Ellis
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Manoa Wacokecoke
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Jeylan Hodgson
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Mackenzie Harman
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Ben Dent
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Callum Rutland
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Harry Aldous
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Jack Aldous
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Garry Schofield
karetaker
12
TODAY
Lennon Bursell
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Brett Ferres
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Reece Dean
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Alex Holdstock
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Thomas Minns
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Josh Guzdek
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Jamie Shaul
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Ben Hodder
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Tom Halliday
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Scott Taylor appointed as Head Coach
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Schoey not a well man
Trebor1
11
TODAY
Guess whos backtrying anyway
Bullseye
4
TODAY
Welcome on board
Sadfish
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
850
England's Women Demolish The W..
672
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
961
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
757
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
1048
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
1555
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
1789
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
2058
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
1646
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
1884
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
2270
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
1807
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
1890
Hull KR Survive Warrington Fig..
2048
Warrington Wolves Break Saints..
2202
POSTSONLINEREGISTRATIONSRECORD
19.64M 1,404 80,15414,103
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.

When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
RLFANS Match Centre
There are currently no matches to display.
Matches on TV
Sat 2nd Nov
MINT2024 3 England M34-16Samoa M
WINT2024 2 ENGLAND W82-0WALES W
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
2m
Pre Season - 2025
mwindass
142
16m
IMG scores
Butcher
261
23m
Game - Song Titles
Wanderer
40565
23m
Memorable Games
RockNRolla
36
24m
BORED The Band Name Game
Wanderer
63058
25m
Film game
Wanderer
5264
42m
Call for funds
Hudd-Shay
183
49m
Planning for next season
satanicmills
173
49m
Squad 2025
Ilkley Fax
29
Recent
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Marcus's Bic
3739
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
13s
New Players
RfE
115
15s
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Marcus's Bic
3739
20s
Planning for next season
satanicmills
173
21s
Garry Schofield
karetaker
12
22s
IMG Score
Pyrah123
66
24s
Squad 2025
Ilkley Fax
29
32s
Recruitment rumours and links
Or thane
3541
32s
Gary Scofield
Rugby Raider
8
40s
NRL Kick Off Rules
stpatricks
7
44s
Rumours and signings v9
NSW
28868
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
A Year to Remember
Zig
1
TODAY
2025 Annual
JamieRobinso
1
TODAY
2025 KIT Thread
Sadfish
1
TODAY
NRL Kick Off Rules
stpatricks
7
TODAY
Garry Schofield
PopTart
6
TODAY
Out of contract 2025
Wires71
8
TODAY
Gary Scofield
Rugby Raider
8
TODAY
Joe Phillips
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Andy Ellis
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Manoa Wacokecoke
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Jeylan Hodgson
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Mackenzie Harman
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Ben Dent
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Callum Rutland
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Harry Aldous
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Jack Aldous
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Garry Schofield
karetaker
12
TODAY
Lennon Bursell
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Brett Ferres
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Reece Dean
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Alex Holdstock
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Thomas Minns
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Josh Guzdek
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Jamie Shaul
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Ben Hodder
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Tom Halliday
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Scott Taylor appointed as Head Coach
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Schoey not a well man
Trebor1
11
TODAY
Guess whos backtrying anyway
Bullseye
4
TODAY
Welcome on board
Sadfish
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
850
England's Women Demolish The W..
672
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
961
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
757
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
1048
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
1555
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
1789
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
2058
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
1646
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
1884
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
2270
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
1807
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
1890
Hull KR Survive Warrington Fig..
2048
Warrington Wolves Break Saints..
2202


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!