Just out of interest as anyone got any constructive alternatives to DR ?

Do you still have the same thoughts GFB?

You do like to make things up. Show me where i've said our players are excluded from training. Fact!

Yes poor game for us against Bradford and on topic because it wasn’t their team that did it.
Likewise the standard of the League although being competitive it’s more like average vs mediocrity across the board with not many games that will be remembered for long so far that’s for sure.

Okay. Fact.

“Hudd-Shay wrote:
Player comes into the club on dr. That player trains maybe twice, at the expense of an established Fax player, learning moves and calls. The dr player is named in the team for the game. On the eve if the game the dr player's club rings SG up and says 'sorry mate, we've changed our mind, send him back. That is doing as you are told!”

“That player trains twice at the expense of an established Fax player.......”
Not named or plays “TRAINS” at the expense of a Fax player.

And if you can’t write properly and actually meant “plays” instead of “trains” your even contradicting your own big EXPENSE point in the same post because if he’s been recalled then the Fax player he was going to replace will come back in and play anyway so its not at his or anyone’s else expense is it! FACT.

At the expense of doesn't mean instead of. Also, i did mean trains not plays. FACT!

So in this setting what’s does it mean then did this Fax player have to pay for his taxi to the training ground?



How was it then, either at training or on match day when you said the DR player was withdrawn was it at the Fax players expense?

Also I notice no denial mention of the other extreme comments about masters, feet on throat etc because there obviously laughable. FACT.

Yes the system we always had,loans of a minimum period of one month.We have never been in a position where we couldn’t raise a 17 and the DR we’ve used this season has been a complete waste of time.The only counter argument could be Sutcliffe who had one game and that lead to a longer stay.No reason why this couldn’t have been an initial loan.

That’s the way to go, tried and tested and if the parent club won’t commit to a month then he won’t be available and we won’t have the choice anyway.
Main stumbling block is the game as a whole would have to agree to it for your proposal to happen otherwise the parent club would just DR with someone else.

Aye, that's almost spot on and is what i've said more than once on here. The only point I would pick out would be where you say 'this' season. I would argue it has been a total waste of time with each different club we've had an embarrasing 'partnership' with. Also, again repeating myself, it's not just the detrimental effect it has on Fax, it's the game as a whole which is being used and abused by SL clubs. Their boot is well and truly on our necks and until we wrestle it off the status quo will well and truly remain.

Yeah nothing changed on my view there, well apart from faxcar telling everyone I think Grix is an awful coach.

I think our link with Cas has been used with respect but the problem is that we are bottom feeding, Cas are awful and have had a bad time with injuries, we have been awful as well for the most part and I bet Grix would have liked to bring some quality in from Cas but the simple fact is that they don't have it.

Before faxcar tries to twist anything else that I have said don't be mistaken that in saying that I think its a good system because I don't, I hate it, but the reality is that it is there and is not going away anytime soon while the money coming in to the game gets less and less. The only good thing about it from our point of view is that it has given us a bit of a try before you buy opportunity. How many players do we have in the team who have played for us on DR who are now either permanent already or will be by the end of the season?