should this thread be called well done sheffield ..again..after all they did same to us last year at their place.

I think he stopped it for most if not all kicks but didn't seem to do it straight away. It was all about rubbing it in and getting us miffed and nothing else.

Stopped it after a minute every time. Fax lad too - though, obviously, not as often.

Ah but the whistleblowers are more eager to stop the clock with a drop out under the sticks, than for kicking.

Grow up, the ref knew we'd tackle crap and let a very under-strength Sheffield team turn us over ???

Sorry I should have said, when the team dropping out, throws the ball as far away as possible, then it passes through about six pairs of hands before being kicked. All teams do this to gain some kind of advantage.

Agree it's painful to watch, and a kick under the posts shouldn't need such careful preparation... but if we'd defended better and not given the penalties away, he wouldn't have had the chance to go for so many kicks at goal...

I didn't mean the ref, I meant Sheffield (Woodencock). And in future ask the question politely please before you make 'tarded comments to me like that again.

Ask which question ?

Hey this did not lose us the game I am not saying that what I am saying is was there any REAL need to take so long for those goal kicks?
As Dors says I am sure it was more about rubbing it in and gaining a psychological advantage - it worked!
Plus you seem to forget what I also said in that its not what we pay our money to watch is it?
I think this is borderline unsporting behaviour imo - like you said so is the drop outs I think the RFL need to review both and give Refs the power to give a penalty for drop outs that take forever or stop the goal being kicked if the kicker is taking too long.
Tough, you only need 30 seconds to goalkick surely?
Count that out 1, 2, 3 zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Do you know when you start a thread and then wish you hadnt ?
Anyway "Well done Sheffield"