John mate ........ I asked if you went to the game last Sunday because you suggested that none of Murrell's (and I wish you'd spell it right) came to nothing, but you was WRONG - one of his kicks created a try. Whereas me pointing out that Fax are the most creative team in this division is RIGHT - they've scored the most points (it's there in black and white, it's a FACT), and Fax4Life was just being darn right rude by asking me a personal question which had nothing to do with anything. So it's not a matter of me "having it both ways". I'm having it one way - which happens to be the correct way.

Give up Tony you old wind up Leading points scorers means leading point scorers, we've smashed sides to bit when were on song. Its tended to be literally that though and its more akin to effective than creative. Doing the same things over and over again, although creating more points than anyone can be termed as such, it doesn't imply new methods of attack or variation are created, it just measures more points have been created, creativity in the context of the threads argument is therefore valid as we are not creating anything new or original in our play by simply smashing the opposition behind the marker position until the opposition is flattened
I therefore call it a draw, and put the arguments down to semantics

I literally loled at KH`s interview in the courier. So he signed these players knowing their shortcomings and wonders why our attack is so 1 dimensional. What was he expecting when in his own words we have a 6/7/9/13 who all shift the ball very slowly?

Was
He asked you if you went to the game?
You asked me the same.
But hey Tony
As you say
Am I right?
I'm not wrong.

Have a good evening.

Creativity is without doubt the key word. The opposition can read us like a book.
110 % for effort tonight.

Bang on, as I said in the other thread we NEED a new hooker who knows the position and a decent number 7. Ideally I'd like us to convert Loose Forward back to a play-making position like we did with Beswick, so possibly/ideally another play-maker. We have the forwards and backs to run riot in this league its just about getting the ball to them.

Backs? In the backs we have Worrincy and Fieldhouse, the rest for me fail to impress or excite.

I said before, Patto for me now will never let you down and makes few errors but gone are his days of flying down the wing, he rarely makes a break, reminds me of alan hardcroft, Tyrer for me just doesn't cut it, Rettie I can see why he plays but he's a 2nd row on the wing in every aspect and way he plays, so we are 1 wing down. Heatons still learning but at some point has to step up.

Its ok saying you could do with better halfbacks,hooker or loose forward but were do you get them from? its unlikely the centurions,sheffield or fev are going to want to release players for you to sign and the players you've got are probably better than what the other clubs have hence why your 3rd in the table

Erm. Just a fiery youngster hanging on the fringes beats the journeymen every time IMO. Make of that what you will.

I'm a Leigh fan Pal.

Snowy - Leigh are average at best. How they beat Sheffield I will never know, cup fever perhaps.

I am gonna bear my ar5e and say that if we meet you again we will win. (perhaps when it counts).

There was "widespread relief" when "boring" Brian Noble came in to stop the rot under Calland, so PLEASE let's not start all this Calland nonsense again! Having followed the 'Fax for a period which has seen 20 coaches come and go, I can honestly say Karl Harrison is in my top 3. That says it all, don't yer think?

Bringing Calland back is not an option, no one at the club would work with him.
Harrison will do for me, the season isn't over yet.
He is well respected by the board and they are the ones with a long term vision for the club.
Keep the faith.

Yeah i know you are, i was merely asking how you can question the title of the thread when you are basing your judgement on the 2 games we have played against Leigh this season.