Yes as soon as Muzza passed to him albeit in our half you just knew it was going to be a try .never in doubt

Thought clauses like that only existed in loan signings,no idea how that can be binding unless they weren't prepared to release him for a couple more weeks ?

That was what RM said in his pre-Dewsbury interview on Fax TV. 1:50 into this... [urlhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhwR8JzBBbo[/url

Shame we can't use yesterday's team momentum for next week but their struggle against Barrow again yesterday raises hope.

You can put what clauses you like into a deal.

I always think this sort of thing shows a lack of confidence by the coach. "I don't think you're good enough for us but, just in case I'm wrong, I don't want you playing against us."

Agree with your synopsis and it seems we can't play Dan Fleming either.

Let's hope we get Springer & Green this weekend.

Well we will get Spring & Greener this weekend.

This happened with Gareth Hock when he played for Leigh against Salford, and it turned out that the clause was either not allowed or not enforcable and he was cleared to play.

[urlhttps://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/apr/17/leigh-gareth-hock-legal-threat-salford-rugby-league-challenge-cup[/url

That said, if we have made a "gentlemans agreement" not to play him then Id rather we stick to it and conduct ourselves in a better way than Marwan and Derek!


Also, this clause is definetly illegal in football, as is shown here...
[urlhttps://www.theguardian.com/football/2007/may/11/newsstory.sport8[/url

Fair shout and well remembered, as you say it must be between the clubs.
Likely Sion Jones or Brandon Douglas in for Dan.

if we keep picking up quality players - then its best to be honouring the agreement that has been made

Better not apply in middle eights....