could hear him on sky all night warning players about things but never took any action, must have thought he was giving too many penalties already.

he was hilarious a real credit to the club

Why? What would that achieve?

teach em not to mess with the best! he was, after all, taunting the mighty fax machine

True Rugby fans just need to either laugh at him or ignore him. If he wants to act like a dick-apparently there is somebody who constantly supports fev who is like this then thats his problem. Rugby League has no place for violence on the terraces.

if he wants to shout abuse at us for 80mins maybe a good beating is what he needs to teach him a lesson, to preserve the good nature of rl

Why do you think crowd violence and physical abuse is OK? Hitting people is not OK and to be honest achieves often nothing but making a problem worse If somebody acts like a dick and has a big gob so what. As long as he does not hit anybody or cause a major problem what is your problem? If he annoys you so much move away. There is no need to hit anybody at a Rugby League game-its a family sport!

why dont you write to him saying that? i never touched nobody!
did it never run through your mind that 'man' deserved some what-for?

yes im biased,but watching it when I got back in, he was giving warnings to Fev players, more than he was ours. He seemed to blow up straight away against us.

Also, why did he allow the Fev players to constantly back chat & straight out swear at him (as they did after Shad went over for our last try)? Seems weak when it comes to fronting up to players

Strange really but he said he called held because a Halifax player had added weight to the tackle. Funny then that when Barker was originally tackled Penky clearly adds weight to the tackle. Why not call held then. Also in the second half Barrie Mac picked up on the two incidents where a Fev player was tackled and was aloud to carry on. The first the Fev player has a Fax player on his ankles and is on his knees a few seconds pass and even though the ball carrying arm hadnt touch his momentum was stopped and it should have been called held.
Child and Hicks are just not very good end of.

I thought Childs did well and was consistent. it was a great game to watch so he couldn't have disrupted the flow that much. To be honest, he could have doubled the penalties as neither side was ever on-side!

He needs to clarify the held rule in my opinion. Fev scored from a penalty he gave when he should have called held and barker passed it and they scored when two tackles were made and he waved play on. Added to the Harris "try" and thats three tries gifted to them. He was inconsistent for both sides but he could have killed us off. This lack of consistency caused frustration and some high shots, could see fax players asking why decisions were going fev's way. I felt for them. Childs needs to be struck off the ref list in my opinion

I watched the game again once i got home and to be honest most of the decisions were right. It seemed completely different watching it live in the stadium.

Apart from the Harris try which was dodgy to say the least and came from Hicks, Childs got most of his calls right. I can't believe i'm saying that after being there but he was.

There were a few fifty fifty calls but that was it really.

The one thing i thought was that Fev were allowed to slow us down more then we were allowed to slow them down. It just seems everyne is allowed to lie on in the tackle against us.

He called held clearly and then Barker passed. The second half incident, he never called held so there isn't a problem. Play to the whistle - Barker didn't.

Billyfax - how else are we expected to slow you down