- Not sure whether this should matter. When we were playing in Toronto it would have actually saved us money. We have 11 away games, thats 11 games to travel to. With Toronto paying for our travel that was 10 away games we had to cover. So were back to the original 11 away games we'll have to pay for which is what it has always previously been. London won't be paying for our travel when we play them will they? Or do you think they should have to?

They should have to, and will be, paying for travel costs for this game. DUCY?

I know it stretches the M62 corridor but I do hope the Toronto idea works long term and doesn't wither on the vine.

On the up side of growth in Canada there is vast potential so I will ride the bumps this year give them some leeway. When you see how Ruby Union is growing in the USA and Canada ( particularly on the 7s side ) it's worth a wild punt as a little side bet.

You may not be the only ones with a shorter away trip than expected https://www.cp24.com/sports/wolfpack-to ... -1.3776975

You may not be the only ones with a shorter away trip than expected https://www.cp24.com/sports/wolfpack-to ... -1.3776975

Nowt would surprise me about the latest darlings of the RFL, or indeed those that run the professional game in our country. We've gone from having different rules for different clubs in English RL, to having clubs in the same division playing to different rules. It's nowt short of disgraceful and as it stands there's nowt we can do about it bar walk away from the game. I can't do that but I'm not far off it. The Corner, shudds. Mallinsons Wappy Nick 3.8%. Mmm!

Well last Season when London Skolars played TWP the official Att was 1524 so if the marketing is right we may be pleasantly surprised