Says in RLE that the Bulls could appeal the appeal!!

Know its off topic but forgot at add that Manning could be banned for up to 13 matches for a grade d and e offences - dont think he can submit an EGP (but might be wrong) , hopefully he wont get that long.

That's if you add together the maximum penalty for both offences. As they were only 40 seconds apart and, in effect, one incident surely the panel won't treat them as 2 totally seperate incidents?

He has definately used his AGP already this season.

Credit to the club for getting a solicitor involved because anyone who has seen the tackle over and over who thinks it is either a shoulder charge or an attack to the head must be on a different planet.

The tackle in itself is nothing more than a penalty for being slightly late in my view, there is no head shot on Sam at all, however, the follow up incident is where he may get hit with a big ban. Dane was silly and im sure he knows it but all this rubbish being spouted about him is laughable.

I've said this from the minute i saw it live and haven't changed my opinion.Apparantly im told there is another
view which suggests a headbutt is first contact,but the rfl have charged him with shoulder ?? suppose we will
see tomorrow.

The Bulls should just drop it now as this constant whining at being the victim in all of this is just alienating them even further. Living in Northowram/Shelf during the height of Bull power was pretty galling and I for one have been taking a great deal of pleasure in watching it all unfold (not that we've room to talk).

It'll be interesting to see how long Marc Green does hang around for once he's clawed back his brass that he's owed. They're going to have a shock but it does us all good to wear a hair shirt from time to time which they may have to get used to if they stay in that crumbling hole at the top of a hill ground.

Rugby League family....cat , ferrets in a sack more like.

Yep it was pretty hard to stomach there were glory fans everywhere - they all used to come to Halifax for a walk round in their Bulls Shirts sing at anyone in Blue and White - I remember watching Bulls v Newcastle Knights in 2002 WCC at Huddersfield - after game were were at train station all Bulls fans were glum (you'd have thought they'd lost) we asked one what was up she said "we are so used to winning trophies we dont celebrate" - Moral is enjoy the good times they dont last forever!!

www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... overturned

www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... overturned

Well where next after the High Court its the Supreme Court , European Court of Human Rights , the UN and then the highest court of all Judge Judy of course - Marc Green on one side and Nigel Wood on the other "Judgement for the plantiff in the amout of 6 points" more like case dismissed !!!!

On Boots they stated that Bradford and their legal team were 100% sure that if it went to the high court they would win.

Something is not right either in the process for originally docking the points and subsequently having that decision upheld by the appeals panel or with the Bulls and the legal advise they are receiving.

Both parties include comments about the good of the game as a whole.

Well if that's the case whoever is in the wrong should be held accountable in that context because the entire fiasco is doing the game as a whole no good whatsoever.

Who are the Bulls taking legal action against?

Bulls v RFL ? Wasnt the body independant of the RFL? The legal precedent it could set for sport in general? What if they win but they are 8 pts a drift? Do Wakey or Salford have to wait before they plan for 2015 if the gap is below 6 pts?

Its laughable, I would go as far to say they do not stand a chance of getting the result they desire in the high court.

I think their chairman is showing a distinct lack of experience when it comes to dealing with the RFL if he thinks this will turn out well for him.

Win, lose or draw, the solicitors and barristers get paid so of course they want to challenge and go to high court, Kerching!!. It would be a dangerous precedent should they win, I can't see it myself but I have no idea what grounds they would appeal a decision of an appeal made by a independent panel. Suck it bulls and deal with the consequences of what the owners did at the time. Every other club has had to.