Quote johngrantsnumber1="johngrantsnumber1"edit posts and put your heads in the sand all your like it is clear for all to see you did not pay the rent to a prolonged period time and did not adhere to the contract you agreed to presumably due to some financial difficulties
if you had anything about you, you would've been trying to try find the roots of the issue rather than just cover it again, fortunatley for you the council has once again bent over for you'"
Oh dear not you and this subject yet again.
I support both clubs like many, I am more Fax than Town but like both to do well.
On the subject of rent you seem to have missed the point that Town got a good deal when the club reformed and NOBODY went on about how low the rent for Town is - like less than half what the rugby pay. So nobody 'bent over ' for Town then???
The point is matey that no matter what league each club is in the rent is the same per game, do you want the Council to put it up if and when hopefully Town get into say the Conference?? and Fax into SL?
No.
The thing you seem to miss is Fax create more income for the stadium (Council now) due to the bars being busier and open longer plus having the outsales under the South Stand add to that the away supporters like Widnes using the North Stand.
So you expect us to pay more??
daft git, go away.