Ah rumours, eh?

Must be true.

It can only be confirmed after "A reliable source....but I can't say on here".

I'll believe it when 'The Sleaze' confirms it.

[size=50And, I know who The Sleaze is.[/size

Heard noble is ment to be bringing three in and getting rid of three. holroyd been one of them.

i thought we played well to be honest. the defence seemed to be a lot more structured however we panicked when fev threw the ball around. i thought jonesy was good at full back and beswick was great at stand off. however Chandler and Cherryholme didn't get that much game time today.. i wonder why?

What does any of this have to do with HHH?

Question on White running into touch - Do you think it is because of his centre being a winger and the lines he is running. Looking at last weeks game Pats did come inside when it looked a better option to go wide.

1st time he was unlucky not to get round the fullback. Second time was a school boy error when we need to be punching out the sixes.

He was sin binned for uttering the words "f*** of Gareth" to the ref after repeatedly questioning the decision!

I thought penky spent most of the first half looking for penalties, and had a go at the ref every single time he was tackled. He really needs to concentrate on his game, because he has the skills to be the best player on the field week in week out, and not on what the ref is doing. We need to be smarter in adapting to different referees, as they all interpret the holding down rule differently, in fact the same ref will interpret it differently on different days??

The discipline of some of the Fax players is definately questionable and whilst it difficult to highlight the main protagonists cos the problem is spread throughout the team, Penky, Jonesy and JG are the main culprits (tho JG wasn't his usually self yesterday).
Danny Jones was exceptionally lucky to avoid a sin binning after the touch judge gave flagged Paul White given his reaction to the touch.
Similarly Sam Barlow's reaction to the touch judge after Matty Dale's try!

I think the decision that set Penky off was the one in the first half where he got tackled and it was the last tackle and the Fev player held him down in what was easily the slowest play the ball of the game. It was as clear a penalty that you will ever see but instead the ref dosnt give the penalty and Penky says something and instead we get penalised. To be to Hewer you know what you get when he is named to ref and the coaches should be stressing this to the players. Its very rare he gives penalties for holding down and in that respect i think that Fev played the ref better than we did.

THOUGHT WE SHOWED UP WELL YESTERDAY!

THEY WERE CERTAINLY UP FOR IT, AND AFEW 50/50 CALLS AND A BOUNCE OF THE BALL AND I THINK WE WOULD HAVE WON.

WE WERE THE BETTER TEAM IN THE SECOND HALF, AND IF ONLY BANNISTER HADNT KNOCKED ON ON 1ST TACKLE, WITH US ON THEIR LINE WITH 5 TACKLES LEFT, I THINK WE WOULD HAVE SCORED AND GONE ONTO WIN.

AIZUE, JONES AND ROB WERE AGAIN TOP CLASS.

FULL OF POSSITIVES.

WE NEED A BIG WIN ON SUNDAY, AS SHEFF WERE POOR YESTERDAY.

UP THE FAX, WELL KICK ON FROM HERE, NO PROBS!