I have a suspicion that the last thing the BOD want is promotion this year.

if rumours are correct and next season will be the last with twelve teams in SL, it would mean that two teams (if no promotion) and three teams (if one club is promoted) would be relegated at the end of it. promotion this the year would make avoiding relegation even harder and cause major financial drain as next year in SL as
- that the cost of securing players to avoid relegation will be even higher - and goodness knows where they would come from.
- on field performances would not be good with the probate team that could be built and this will inevitably result in reduce attendances - and less cash through the gates
- limited additional SL income to sustain these costs, as TV money reducing.
- clubs like Fax who have taken loans from government schema will need to start to pay them back, causing drain on cash flow.

Even without a reduction in SL, as we have seen it is very hard securing the right players when promoted, and the cash issues will continue.

It's common sense that either way a consequence of promotion is the team would be exposed to severe financial pressures, without a strong cash reserve or a backer. If even Wigan are now making a substantial loss its very very tough

Whilst its hard to admit, with crowds around a 1000, no investor the Club will not return to the top table soon....if ever.

Hello fevgrinder i have got my ticket for next week and even thou i think we could be on the end of a good hiding i am looking forward to the match next week. As for the points you make you could well be right i don't know if that is what the board have done if they have i will hold my hands up and say i got it wrong. But why would they sign the players mentioned and then within months force simon to get rid of them and tell him he cant replace them. And it is not just springer its brearley/ hewitt/ bourouh too surely we could of replaced at least one them by not doing so it as weekend the side and looks like wasting a good opportunity to finish the season as strongly as possible.

I don’t disagree that Fax could have finished stronger with all those players available to SG and I’m sure that he knows that. So on that basis I doubt that SG has let all those players go, whom I suspect have left for various reasons. It is just too easy to blame the coach, sometimes it his his fault and sometimes it’s not.

I’m hoping to meet up with Hudd-Shay and Bentlyman in Wakey before the Fax game, so looking forward to that day win lose or draw.

Dave have sent you a PM

Thanks, I have responded.

They are poster on here who are aware of what goes on behind the scenes at fax. And i speak to some of them at games and from what i have been told it was simons decision to move gadwin on he was not happy with is defence and gadwin was not happy about this they came to a impasse and gadwin left. It had nothing to do with the board cutting costs so i don't think this can just be passed off as me blaming the coach for everything. I wouldn't expect you as a fev fan to have watched fax tv and listened to simons interviews on this but how they have gone from we are looking to bring players in to we are sticking to what we have got in the space of weeks is bizarre. And stating that we cant because it would not be in the spirit of the game to do so when other clubs are i find hard to believe. He said we was looking for replacements for all of the players that have left at various points even Olly Russell who we only had for one game against you but no one as arrived yet.