Watching out for a few things.
Gadwin’s aggression and offload with some second phase as a result.
The two new half’s.
Nicks class and threat.
Brandon and Amir dummy half runs.
Zack, as not seem much of him but certain he will be up for it.
13050.gif[b:112mouem][color=#0000FF:112mouem][size=100:112mouem]
"Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid."― Albert Einstein[/size:112mouem] [/color:112mouem][/b:112mouem]
[b:112mouem][color=#0000FF:112mouem][size=100:112mouem]
"Everybody gets so much information all day long that they lose their common sense." ― Gertrude Stein[/size:112mouem][/color:112mouem][/b:112mouem]
[b:112mouem][color=#0000FF:112mouem][size=100:112mouem]
"Don't believe everything you read on the internet" ― Abraham Lincoln [/size:112mouem][/color:112mouem][/b:112mouem]:13050.gif
Not a bad first hit out and good to see some rugby again.
Standouts for me were Calcott, I thought he went well and will be interesting to see if Grix gives him a shot. Our half backs went pretty well and you can tell they have played together which makes a hell of a difference. Springer looks beastly, he has the potential to rip up this league. I thought Barber had a good game. Bourough can hit thats for certain. Grix has to find a spot for JWH, he has too much class to leave out. Obviously it won't be at full back so its going to have to be at centre so will mean Mcgrath missing out.
Other than Calcott and Woody I think the rest of the team likely picks itself for next week.
Thought Zach McComb and Matt Garside both had good games too. It would be a shame to leave Conor McGrath out as he went well yesterday. One thing that did stand out is that the team actually look fit and we definitely do have some strength in depth this year.
Though the Rugby League coverage was OK too, not bad for a fiver.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.