From my view it looked like there was a Leigh player stood in our line that blocked off the inside defender meaning he couldn't cover across and tackle Smith. I'm one of the least biased people you will meet, if it's a genuine try there will be no complaints. My instant initial view of it was, it was obstruction. I maybe completely wrong I guess we will soon see.

I said that about charge downs they just give the opposition another set of six 9 times out of 10 and only benefits you when near their line and hardly ever when you are in your own 20.

We keep on changing the rules in RL, and this one would be an easy one to tweak. Don't reset the tackle count for a charge down. Simple.

Yeah, the Leigh dummy runner blocks off the most direct path to smith which buys Smith half a yard IMHO not intentional but still obstruction in my view. All irrelevant now though.

Another game that's got away from us and we literally could have won every match this season so far and been sitting pretty at the top of the league. A little bit of tweaking and we could easily go on another long winning run. Miles in at FB, what a good return he had, Sharp on't wing and Murrell at LF when fit and we won't go far wrong. Victorian, Fax. Bristol Beer Factory, Independence 4.6 % Mmm!

There has been a lot of talk on here from various people calling for Scott to play at 13, however nobody seems to have considered the extra defensive effort that would be required from him. At the moment, playing at 6, he defends between wing and centre. At 13 he would be 3, maybe 4 players further inside in defensive line. A modern loose forward would be expected to make 30-35 tackles minimum over 80 minutes. The physical effort required from Scott would render him a passenger in attack.
However, with Scott at 13 and Moore + Jonno at HB's at least we have Scott's leadership on the field, which at the moment is a massive factor.