It seems that the issue at the rugby club is the dIfferance in the two rents the football clubs is a lot less. Does anyone know why this is. if there is an agreement between the rugby club and the council and the council seem to be sticking to this agreement I can't see how the rugby club can avoid paying the agreed amount until the current agreement is up for review.

Happy Birthday Linda, don't be depressed, life begins at 40.

If I remember correctly both clubs were more than willing to have a shared shop/office facility and thats what the East Stand design was based on. Then HTAFC went bust, in came the new chaps and they were against the sensible idea of the two clubs working together on a shared facility.

That sounds about right given the Town directors will not even interact with any official from the rugby and that started long before all the stadium row kicked off. Too up their own backsides by the sounds of it. I would imagine it will be a while before there is change though as it must be a cushy number with all those undisclosed fees.

They struggle to interact with the supporters nevermind Fax officials. I do think things would be greatly different if the two clubs could/would work together and do appreciate that its more than likely Mr Bosomworth and his fellow out of towners where the problem lies.

Fax appointed a second tier board member whose specific task was to improve relations with the football club but never heard anything since.Craig Poskitt had a meeting with town officials and described the progress as 'baby steps' but his departure probably signalled an end to further talks.