Quote: Hindsfordleyther79 "I don't believe for a minute he actually intended to cause the injury he did, but he did. He intended to hit him though and in doing so he must know there is a chance of an injury and in doing it the way he did there was no opportunity or possibility of Barlow defending himself.'"
One but he did would be enough.
For goodness sake what a stupid post.
Quote
"I don't believe for a minute he actually intended to cause the injury"
"He intended to hit him though and in doing it the way he did etc etc
Isn't the point of a tackle in Rugby League to not only halt play but to hurt someone?
Surely Paul Rowley doesn't say to his players "tackle, but be gentle"
As I say go to bed, chill out and enjoy your game of "touch rugby at school tomorrow"