Even if we were 'innocent' there should never have been the issue in the first place. Look at the CC rules as stated- if someone had bothered to read them and then check if our one midseason signing had played previously in it this season, theres no way hed have been in the team at Swinton.

If we are innocent then surely that is nothing that the club have done wrong and that is an issue for the RFL to sort out and for you lot to vent your frustration at although we all know that is a futile past time.

I paraphrased the word. Innocent would not be the correct word if we were let off, because frankly rules are rules, and us being declared 'innocent' would be hard to justify

Why flea?

I remember this, (and have posted something about this elsewhere), from back in Fax's SL days I think it was. Wasn't it brought in when Millward fielded a practical Saints 2nd team in a crucial league game the week before the CC final claiming that all those players he omitted were injured? I wasn't aware that this rule had been rescinded.