Personally i think its a way clubs can get promising youngsters for nothing and the NL club gets a good shafting.

On the flip side though, you could say its an advantage for the NL clubs as if the loan player in question has a good spell, then returns to the SL club, doesn't get a game, he may seek a permanant move to the NL club. Especially if the NL club are a favourite for SL status come 2012.

Look at Maloney, can barely get a game for Hull, will play every week for us. He'll go back to Hull where they seem to be on a policy of signing every Aussie cast-off, can't get a game because of this. Where can he get guaranteed game time?

Mixed feelings, yer ok the player gets a chance to step up to SL but when?
Who pays his wages? If the SL team do is that fair on the rest of the clubs in the Championship as it would distort that clubs salary cap? If not what does the Championshop club get from this deal?
If they sign a player why don't SL clubs give the player the experience at that level even if the player may not play many games if any at least they are getting full time training and all that goes with SL, they can get Reserve grade rugby at a SL level too.
Is a player as commited to a club if they are only there on loan plus what do the other players think of the 'big time' Charlie?
Why not just take the player and have done with like it has always been???

Is this similar? www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... er-2292222

Is this similar? www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... er-2292222

How could this become a rule if the SL clubs decide?

Who runs the sport at this level? I know the RFL allegedly advised against dual reg last season, so how could SL force this through if the RFL are in charge?

Maybe we just don't need Big Nigel and his mob and we can just get rid of them and save the game some money.

I will point our he earns more than our prime minister

He may get paid more than the PM, earning it is another thing.