The difference for me was the half's both Craven and Drinkwater while not perfect offered more composer near the line and a better kicking game.


Those few sets we had on there line at the end i think if that had been the other way around they would of found a way over. jouffret did look short of confidence in the first half he was just used to kick on the last but in the second half he started to run the ball which tested there defence more. The positives was we more than matched them upfront and for the majority of the first period we had the better of it even with McCarron going off.


With London improving Saturdays game looks harder than it did a few weeks back. Kyle for me is struggling to find improvement in the squad on a level needed to get wins, he keeps praising our effort so that for me says too many players are either not good enough or he needs to take responsibility for playing players out of position and not getting the best out of what he as available to him.

Having just watched the game back, without the help of alcohol lol, it just reiterated what i saw on Sunday, not a lot to beat but ultimately not good to do it. It also confirms my thoughts on Jack Hansen, not one run in the whole 80 minutes, just catch and pass as in most games he plays. Joe Keyes would have made a difference in that game, we are so predictable on our opponents line. What has changed since the start of the season when we looked like we would score every time we attacked? London next but not confident...again!