Can I ask a genuine question, Stanley?

If nuclear weapons are fake, NASA is fake, We're being tricked into thinking the earth is flat, that evolution is a hoax, that there's secret societies controlling the world for their own benefit, and probably lots of other ideas that you haven't made public. Why? and what links all these ideas together into a coherent whole? and what sources do you rely on for these claims and how do you verify their accuracy?

I'm genuinely interested.

Sorry Butcher i'll answer your question in due course i got sidetracked again by an irate erroneous inaccurate copy and paste frenzy.

All footage that had to do with a mushroom cloud was faked. Mushroom clouds do not grow from high altitude blasts. A mushroom cloud must be seeded from ground level to express it's characteristic shape.

The post bombing photos of Hiroshima and Nagasaki appear to be correct. These pictures bare the signature of an M-69 fire bombing attack exactly like the attack on Tokyo 6 months earlier.

Also note that Japan became the target of the highest degree of censorship following those historical bombings. No information left Japan in the media or otherwise without US approval. The hoaxster's paradise in fact.

Speaking of radiation the experts said nothing would grow in Hiroshima for 70 years following the bombing yet Oleanders were growing everywhere just one week after. The hoaxsters called that a miracle.

Seismological data or seismic records of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and Novaya Zemlya are AWOL, missing. Especially the 50 megaton Tsar Bomba should have bent seismometer needles all the way around the world yet not one is there to be examined. Hiroshima was estimated to be the Richter equivalent of 6.4 which means the Soviets had the means to confirm the false claims of the American hoaxsters. Of course the Soviet leadership had similar hoax plans so they clammed up instead and played their cold war hoax.

I don't mind challenges to my information I welcome them. Haven't found one yet that has made me change my mind but I still welcome the questions being challenged with rationality.

Whilst I await your reply to my last correction of your bullcrap, your basic premise is just wrong. The bombs were exploded at 500 metres and 600 metres. Not at "high altitude". Which bit of that are you having trouble with? It's not much higher than the Empire State building. Why would you persist with your straw man about them being detonated at "high altitude"? Do you think nobody sees through it?


Have you checked with all seismic ground stations, then? Can you post their replies? Oh, you forgot to mention that this bomb was an airburst, approx 4000 metres. Or that


It wasn't, in this context, but nevertheless the Soviets, if they did have the means, notably did not denounce the claims as fake. Which to most people supports the logical conclusion that that the bomb was real. But to you, it's conspiracy on conspiracy, and so if the Soviets fail to "confirm the false claims" that doesn't mean the Americans HAD exploded a bomb ... it means ... well, it must mean that ... the Russians were in on the fakery!

My view of this Nuclear fraud, Is so called nuclear power generating plants are dump loads, big kettles that boil off the excess energy produced by the big utilities. They don't generate any energy they dispose of it so the big utilities can justify high domestic energy rates. By hiding the surplus this way they are creating the illusion of an energy shortage and they can keep your electricity bills as high as possible. Plus they make billions selling these huge kettles as so called nuclear power generators. That my gist.

Ahhh. So Sizewell B is a kettle! You really are comedy gold, Stan.

But maybe you could clarify - what, exactly, do the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, and the Office for Nuclear Regulation, do all day then, and why has nobody rumbled that there is nothing to decommission or dispose of or store? Except maybe kettle elements?

And by what mechanism do these here "kettles" produce tons of radioactive waste that needs to be stored/disposed of?

Stanley you're onto something here, my son works at Springfield not the Homer Simpson plant, ignore the nursery wiffle waffle.This deceptive nuclear industry, be it weapons or under the guile of commercially viable nuclear reactors is the paradise for the elite. The whole ripoff scheme is shrouded in national security protocols and security bonding which means you can't discuss your work outside the plant if you don't want to incur the wrath of the WNA and risk prison for attempted nuclear terrorism. The whole scam is compartmentalized so Sam doesn't know what George is up to. Perfect cover for the atom bomb hoax clusters.

It's also the best way to keep things secure, both from an external and internal view. The 'compartmental' nature of the industry helps not only security but safety to workers, other on-site workers, and the general public from contamination issues. I'd agree that it's a massive financial sinkhole, especially around decommissioning areas, but that's to do with managers, out-sourcing and work practice rather than the system. I've worked in the industry for five years (without going into details I'm sure Stanley can appreciate the reasons I wont go into any details after a previous conversation) and it is sensitive, especially in the current climate.

I can reassure you that there isn't anything going on in these places other than what they were designed to do. Or in the case of decommissioning, what they once did.

Sorry to be the bearer of boring news...

So you have conflicts of interest then ? The sensitivity is borderline insane if you ask me, no wonder whispers grow loud.

Conflicts of interest regarding what?

People always whisper about things they don't, can't, or wont have access to. Whispers are always way over the top because, well, people don't tend to gossip about the mundane when it comes to these things. It has to be secure and sensitive by its very nature. If it wasn't we'd have all kinds of problems.

I suggest reigning-in your imagination a little. It's okay to speculate, but in my experience when you get a lot of speculation, it's not long before wild ideas become cemented as fact because they are repeated enough times rather than any grain of truth comes forward.

Often, the truth is a let down. A bit boring. Almost always normal.

I'm just offering an opinion based on my experiences in a job where I was not constrained or compartmentalized because of the nature of what I did.

Conflicts of interest because of you're involvement within the industry. How high did you scale.

I understand what you're implying based on your experience with respect to health and safety etc, but I'm also in the know that censorship derives your opinion. I'd love to spill the beans on certain substantive issues that bare some weight but I'd be a clown to broadcast it on here. Stanley contributed the nucleus that hallmarks the nature of this beast. Censorship speaks the loudest here.

Not at all. There's no conflict of interest because these places do what they were built for. The self-imposed censorship I mentioned is my preference based on the job I did, which is based around the security of these sites. Not only would I be foolish giving details on a public forum, I'd be in some trouble. That's the nature of the work I did, not due to some kind of Draconian censorship imposed by some strange controlloing power. I chipped-in on the conversation based on a couple of lines that said everything was secret for nefarious reasons, which is not true, and some other lines saying that Nuclear reactors are just some kind of steam factories set-up for some reason to fool us all. Also not true.

You can believe whatever you want if it keeps you amused. It's not like anything I say will change your opinion.

Butcher...

I totally understand and respect your background and situation with regards to this subject and i also respect your opinion especially after the conversation we privately had previously, however i'm of the opinion as to what i've read and watched on this matter, a simple watch of Galen Winsor is fascinating to whatever side of the fence you sit on. After this post i'm ceasing posting on this subject as i think my message has been said loud and clear Cheers. rlGalen Winsorrl.

Unfortunately, Galen Winsor and this video have been given a thorough treatment by someone who loves their facts. I'm not sure anyone will have the stamina to go through the whole blog as it's very long but also very comprehensive. I, likewise, will retire from the thread as I've said all I want to on the subject and don't want to be going tit-for-tat.

rlClick here for the video lowdownrl

Cheers.