Quote: Doom&Gloom Merchant "If there aren't any Satellites, would be NASA's reason for creating the concept of Satellites & making people think they're there? Why would they bother?'"
And what would be the point of maintaining ad infinitum a detailed holographic array of fake satellites, which look to be real but aren't, that practically no-one on the planet gives a shoite about, and which are holographically projected to be seen perfectly from anywhere on Earth, when no conspiracist can point to a SINGLE "projector".
But I have 100% confidence that the usual suspects will not address the obvious namely that on any given clear night you can watch literally hundreds of objects in orbit, with your own eyes. They prefer to totally ignore inconvenient undeniable facts.
It was like the inconvenient ISS which, damn it, you can watch from anywhere on the globe when night, clear sky and its path at your location intersect. This was just a "holograph". But - as the "holograph" crosses the Sun - it is silhouetted! How could that be? Yes - you guessed it - any image that doesn't fit is "CGI". This is so, even though with some planning you can watch the ISS cross the face of the Sun, or the Moon, with your very own eyes, but they refuse to entertain that, because once they saw it, they would have to admit it is real, and that would never do!
They will dismiss literally millions of images as "CGI". Even one you took yourself tonight. It would be CGI, or cut'n'paste. Their mindset simply does not permit admitting ANY image that doesn't "fit" as real.
By analogy, they can't deny the visibility of these ubiquitous satellites -- so don't! Ignore the problem altogether! Standard fingers in ears na-na-na reaction. Sad, really.