[iFirstly, Copy Paste Repeat and not your literature or thought process utter plagiarism. Secondly I was the one who suggested and mentioned the Jet stream in my original question. Without the Jet stream the flight times would be identical, proving no spinning ball as i have already proven[/i

[iThirdly, nice diversion tactic when beaten change the topic like you did on the Nuclear thread. Fourthly. The “Coriolis Effect” is often said to cause sinks and toilet bowls in the Northern Hemisphere to drain spinning in one direction while in the Southern Hemisphere causing them to spin the opposite way, thus providing proof of the spinning ball-Earth. Once again, however, just like Foucault’s Pendulums spinning either which way, sinks and toilets in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres do not consistently spin in any one direction! Sinks and toilets in the very same household are often found to spin opposite directions, depending entirely upon the shape of the basin and the angle of the water’s entry, not the supposed rotation of the Earth. [/i

[iWhile the premise makes sense - that the earth’s eastward spin would cause the water in a toilet bowl to spin as well in reality, the force and speed at which the water enters and leaves the receptacle is much too great to be influenced by something as miniscule as a single, 360-degree turn over the span of a day. When all is said and done, the Coriolis effect plays no larger role in toilet flushes than it does in the revolution of CDs in your stereo. The things that really determine the direction in which water leaves your toilet or sink are the shape of the bowl and the angle at which the liquid initially enters that bowl.[/i
[i
The Coriolis Effect is also said to affect bullet trajectories and weather patterns as well, supposedly causing most storms in the Northern Hemisphere to rotate Anti-clockwise, and most storms in the Southern Hemisphere to rotate clockwise, to cause bullets from long range guns to tend towards the right of the target in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern Hemisphere. Again, however, the same problems remain. Not every bullet and not every storm consistently displays the behaviour and therefore cannot reasonably be used as proof of anything. What about the precision of the sight aperture, human error, and wind? What about Michelson-Morley-Gale’s proven motion of the aether’s potential effect? Why does the Coriolis Effect affect most storms but not all? If some storms rotate clockwise in the North and Anti-clockwise in the South, how do those storms escape the Coriolis force? And if the entire Earth’s spin is uniform, why should the two hemispheres be affected any differently? Coriolis’s Effect and Foucault’s Pendulum are both said to prove the Earth moves beneath our feet, but in reality only prove how easy it can be for wolves in sheep’s clothing to pull the wool over our eyes. The Earth is stationary. [/i

OK i chaleneg you - find any passage from my post that is cut /paste / plagiarized.

The FACT is - there is none. But you couldn't care less about making (the same repeated) false accusation, despite having no evidence, because that is the way you approach the rest of factual information. But i will thank you to "put up or shut up". LINK to where you say I plagiarized from or else you are shown up to be a liar and a fantasist.


As explained ad infinitum, the flight times given theoretical zero wind conditions would be the same, because the air would be still, relative to the ground. Even for someone as brainwashed by your own dogma as you are, you must see this is no "proof" of any such thing. Given spinning ball and atmosphere, or given non-spinnig ball and atmosphere, the journey times would be the same. For reasons which should be so obvious they are not worth repeating. So, a fundamental error Stan - again.


You are the master diversion tactics man not anyone else! You are also the delusional who claims there are no nuclear bombs nor ever were, and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear explosions never happened. I did try to explain this to you but you are set in that delusion so crack on.


Wow. Well, there is a conclusive argument.A bare, bald assertion, that flies in the face of a zillion pieces of evidence, research, physics and facts. Yes, that really was worth saying, wasn't it?

[iLMAO. No, No No. The earth is stationary. As you said, the air moves with the earth spin,[/i[i Well how do i see clouds moving in all directions eh? Not just west to east, they go north to south, and east to west! That in itself proves the earth doesn't spin[/i.

Stan you have just convinced me you are a troll. But, either way you are at this point not worth taking seriously given the depths to which such desperate retorts have sunk. This sub-puerile stuff doesn't merit any response.

I am no Troll. I'm passionate about my beliefs. How can i take you seriously when you continue to post cartoon composites. Do me a favour. Godwins Law or what. You Abuse means you lose. Bye.

[iAs for your moving train example there's absolutely no doubt of proof that the earth is stationary. When sitting in a rapidly moving railway carriage, let a spring-gun be fired forward, or in the direction in which the train is moving. Again, let the same gun be fired, but in the opposite direction; and it will be found that the ball or other projectile will always go further in the first case than in the latter.[/i

[iIf a person leaps backwards from a horse in full gallop, he cannot jump so great a distance as he can by jumping forward. Leaping from a moving sledge, coach, or other object, backwards or forwards, the same results are experienced. Many other practical cases could be cited to show that any body projected from another body in motion, does not exhibit the same behaviour as it does when projected from a body at rest. None of the results are the same when projected in the same direction as that in which the body moves, as when projected in the opposite direction; because, in the former case, the projected body receives its momentum from the projectile force, plus that given to it by the moving body; and in the latter case, this momentum, minus that of the moving body. Hence it would be found that if the earth is moving rapidly from west to east, a cannon fired in a due easterly direction would send a ball to a greater distance than it would if fired in a due westerly direction. But the most experienced artillerymen many of whom have had great practice, both at home and abroad, in almost every latitude have declared that no difference whatever is observable. That in charging and pointing their guns, no difference in the working is ever required.[/i[

[iGunners in war ships have noticed a considerable difference in the results of their firing from guns at the bow, when sailing rapidly towards the object fired at, and when firing from guns placed at the stern while sailing away from the object These details of practical experience are utterly incompatible with the supposition of a revolving earth.[/i [iThanks for your input in clearing this up.[/i
]

][i

Quote: King Street Cat "Ferocious Aardvark Wrote As i've highlighted above a plethora of evidence of his CGI fetish. I also highlighted your comment where you admitted the shot is a composite here "You know nothing about it nor the photographers who created the composite" .Hahaha You're becoming more of a laugh post by post, Look at your contradictory tongue twisted comment in your first paragraph in your laat post. I highlighted it, please carry on amusing me.[/i

No, I have now blocked you, because not only are you more deluded than any other person I have ever conversed with, you are now rambling, ranting, simply spouting increasingly irrelevant nonsense, and appear hysterical.

Your increasingly bizarre behaviour, coupled with the fact that you have a total block on ever even considering a single thing anybody else writes, unless it fits your obsessive lunatic drivel, means that whatever you are, there is no point in attempted comunication as you are no longer on "receive". If you ever were.

Goodbye, Stanley. Parts of it were interesting, but no longer. We shall not speak again.

No worries, i'll miss your amusing tongue twisters proves how you can give it, but can't take it, Also obsessive lunatic personal digs eh Despite your immature vitriolic abuse i wish you well in your future endeavours. Adios.

“When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.” - Socrates.

I'm confused - just for the sake of summarising, are we now being asked to believe that:

1. the earth is flat and stationary
2. satellites are a figment of millions of imaginations, all working in sync to perpetuate a massive and pointless lie
3. space exploration and everything we know about the solar system and beyond is made up (see point 2)
4. Nuclear energy is actually just a big kettle, and it's all made up (see points 2&3)
5. Aeroplanes don't fly where we expect them to and all the data to suggest otherwise is made up (see points 2,3&4)
6. Gravity and Newtonian laws of physics are lies, made up and perpetuated by a secret society that has persisted through the ages to stop us believing in god
7. God is real

Have I missed anything?