news.sciencemag.org/physics/2014 ... -reactor-0 Very early days and people are (rightly) skeptical, as fusion has been 20 years away for the last half century. However, if it comes off it will be a game changer.

news.sciencemag.org/physics/2014 ... -reactor-0 Very early days and people are (rightly) skeptical, as fusion has been 20 years away for the last half century. However, if it comes off it will be a game changer.

fusion is definately the future, it really is as good as it sounds, unlimited energy friendly and without radiation. Its strange not more resources has been put into the southern france project as its going really slowly. The biggest energy injustice is the fact that they use standard nuclear reactors for, when there is a way of recycling nuclear waste back into reactors, but its as profitable for companies to make these types of reactors, absolutely disgusting

Fusion is the best part of a century away - if it's possible at all.

Even if they somehow managed to push through a fully-functioning, comprehensively tested reactor in the next thirty years it'll then take a similar amount of time to develop a scaleable commercial prototype which can be rolled out into the global marketplace.

Only then can the serious work begin of developing an entire fission infrastructure (from the macro-level right down to the micro/regional) which can integrate seamlessly into the existing power-generation framework.

People forget that it took the best part of half a century to develop this country's vast network of fuel storage depots, refineries, service stations etc. etc. - not to mention the dizzying number of vehicles, ships (tankers etc.) which service their needs.

And even if fusion does work out - it still doesn't address the possible shortage of critical products such as plastics, fertilizers, medicines, pesticides etc. in a post-carbon world...

I'd like to add my opinion and experience based on this matter Pardon the pun.

Having worked within the fire industry, a portion of my role involved a frequent service and Fire assessment visit to a well known nuclear reactor plant. I had lengthy conversations with the Nuclear plant operators which has given me great insight to understanding of this field with their input.

[iNuclear power is real; nuclear weapons are a hoax[/i. Where to start? Most of the work so far that has been shown in how the pictures from Hiroshima and Nagasaki are obvious photo-manipulations, how the "nuclear arms race" was a series of fear porn advertisements from the "Cold War" theatre, how the claims of explosions and radiation don't match the evidence record.

I'm willing to question that nuclear power too is a hoax but not until I've seen enough strong evidence, and everything I've seen points the other direction. For a quick response to any of the claims that nuclear power plants are "overload" stations and actually powered by coal or something else maybe hydrogen or something else from the grid[i (thermal energies)[/i low enough that they stand a chance of being absorbed by the fuel nuclei. In a nuclear power plant, a moderator is used to slow down the neutrons and water is often what is used for this ([ialthough there are other materials)[/i. There is nothing in nuclear weapons to slow down the neutrons released from the initial fission, so any chain reaction would die out rather quickly. This is also what we see when prompt criticality is accidentally achieved in nuclear plant accidents ([irapid spike in energy and then a meltdown as the reaction is not sustained[/i). Nuclear power is a delicate game of sustaining that reaction, and a bomb doesn't accomplish that.

Study every nuclear power plant disaster in detail. When prompt criticality is reached, everything melts down. There is no explosion or ridiculously absurd mushroom cloud or half dome of disintegrating energy. Let's take a look at some examples.

[iHere is the US Army's experimental nuclear reactor, SL-1[/i. A control rod was accidentally removed too fast and caused prompt criticality. Result

Here is Chernobyl. Same thing, once prompt criticality is reached, the fuel quickly melts and the reaction burns itself out. This a massive amount of energy, but not explosive energy that creates some vaporizing wave from a science fiction movie. The only explosion is due to the rapid expansion of the water that is used to cool the fuel, and it is a steam explosion.rlChernobylrl

[iBasically. The nuclear weapons Bull that they sell us [/isomehow instead of releasing energy to the immediate environment create some half-dome explosion that radiates outward and upward ([ibut not downward[/i). This is based upon a top secret confidential "geometric arrangement of the nuclear fuel material". There is no scientific explanation that you can find if you dig here, you will have to accept the "confidential geometric arrangement" if you want to continue to believe in magical super weapons.

I personally don't believe nuclear power or weapons exist at all. I think it's been one hell of a massive/brilliant sham in the art of Bull. It's perfect. It's what you can call a classic heist of our hard earned money and minds.

Nuclear energy [i(BWR[/i), pressurised water reactor [i(PWR),[/i liquid metal fast breeder reactor [i(LMFBR). [/iThen there's the different coolants and what not. It seems ridiculous when you think about it but it is probably an excellent ruse in their game for how thy actually utilise those power stations., some of them don't show signs of storage containers and some do. Maybe some are playing with other by-products.

I especially believe the nuclear submarine lark is absolutely bogus. I believe those are some kind of Stirling type engine.
Also the nuclear warheads blasted out vertically from them by....wait for it....[i..COMPRESSED FRIGGING AIR.[/i This pushes the massive missile out of the deep water and into the atmosphere where it then ignites and flies to its target. Hahahaha.

They must be laughing their war heads off at us, whoever it is at the top. Sometimes I don't know whether to admire them for the clever bull in shoving it in our faces yet still leaving us doped up or to sit back sucking my thumb rocking in my chair .Hahaha.

Here we go again... Search, copy, paste, repeat!

Leading scientists of Nazi Germany including[i Werner Heisenberg [/iwere captured by the British in 1945 and housed for a while at Farm Hall in England. Their private conversations were secretly recorded which remained a secret for many decades as it revealed they did not have a clue about nuclear weapons. These leaders of the alleged Nazi atom bomb project were painfully ignorant about such affairs, and when news of Hiroshima and Nagasaki came their way, it shocked them badly. They didn't have a clue. So much for a Nazi atom bomb program. It's american propaganda.

This book is a transcript of their secretly recorded conversations
Compiled by Jeremy Bernstein

You have to be a special kind of deluded to believe there was no Hiroshima nor Nagasaki. There have been and are thousnads of nuclear powered ships, inclduing submarines and aircraft carriers, and Russia operates nuclear icebreakers regularly in the Arctic. www.world-nuclear.org/info/non-p ... red-ships/ There are 438 nuclear power plants in 31 countries.

You have to be a special kind of deluded to believe there was no Hiroshima nor Nagasaki. There have been and are thousnads of nuclear powered ships, inclduing submarines and aircraft carriers, and Russia operates nuclear icebreakers regularly in the Arctic. www.world-nuclear.org/info/non-p ... red-ships/ There are 438 nuclear power plants in 31 countries.

On this subject, you might be interested in checking out a book published in 1950 by a Russian aviator deeply involved in the formation of the US Air Force by the name of Alexander P. DeSeversky and entitled "Air Power which contains rich information about the 1945 bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as DeSeversky was the chief inspector of these bombed out cities and found results which radically contradicted the scientific establishment and which were also published in Reader's Digest in 1946. DeSeversky was also an eyewitness of the 1946 Bikini island bomb test with the famous mushroom cloud photos surrounded by battleships. DeSeversky shreds the common interpretation of this explosion and photograph in his book as well as of the Alamagordo, New Mexico bomb test earlier in 1945.

rlAir Power Key to Survivalrl'
By Alexander DeSeversky


Walt Disney incidentally produced a 1943 war movie entitled 'Victory Through Air Power' based on DeSeversky's book of the same name and had a direct influence upon the subsequent founding of the Air Force as a separate military branch.


'Alexander P. DeSeversky rlQuest For Air Powerrl
(a recent biography of DeSeversky which contains a chapter on his analysis of nuclear bombs and the congressional hearing in which he was questioned about this by hostile pro-Navy senators from Connecticut USA).

A few facts from DeSeversky's second book[i 'Air Power

It has photographs of several areas of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that were unaffected by the bombs, and the photos were taken less than a month after the bombs were dropped. These photos and photos like them were strictly censored and not allowed to reach the American public.

Hiroshima's tram cable car transportation system was back working everywhere throughout the city ([ieven in the most damaged areas[/i) less than 48 hours after the bomb was dropped on the city.

The 1945 Alamagordo, New Mexico test did explode a bomb attached to a 100 foot tall tower as mimicked in the otherwise mythical Harrison Ford movie scene. DeSeversky quotes an eyewitness to this event who was a Manhattan project scientist who wrote that the tower that held the bomb was not even destroyed by the bomb's explosion. The bottom half of the tower was still standing, and this object was obviously at the centre of this "nuclear" bomb explosion. This fact can be verified because this scientist wrote a book which contains this statement.

The information about atomic bombs takes about two or three chapters of DeSeversky's book which is primarily about combating outdated nineteenth century military strategy still extent especially in the navy. He was a disciple of the dynamic and outspoken Billy Mitchell and also a friend of Lord Trenchard, founder of the British RAF. Politically, he was an anti-communist conservative, but the book is interesting. If one wanted a big picture strategy of how to destroy american military and industrial power, this book shows how to do it. It's in Billy Mitchell's "vital centres" doctrine.


Like i explained in my first post on this topic .[i There is nothing in nuclear weapons to slow down the neutrons released from the initial fission, so any chain reaction would die out rather quickly. This is also what we see when prompt criticality is accidentally achieved in nuclear plant accidents (rapid spike in energy and then a meltdown as the reaction is not sustained). Nuclear power is a delicate game of sustaining that reaction, and a bomb doesn't accomplish that.[/i

I've added another astonishing link Uncovering rlThe Nuclear Hoaxrl There's plenty more literature and publishings within this field exposing this big Whopping fear mongering pork pies.

As we're cutting and pasting, I thought as good a way as any to debunk your nonsense was this

Back on topic. rlNukes Do Not Existrl

The Nuclear Hoax the above documentary explores the truth about nuclear energy and the surprisingly abundant evidence that nuclear weapons are a hoax. Many of the nuclear explosion videos we have all seen and presumed real are shown to be complete fakes using model trees, houses and cars exploding on a set.

The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not the result of one large explosion as advertised, but rather the result of a fire-bombing campaign comparable to Tokyo's fire-bombed remains. Hiroshima and Nagasaki also never experienced anything like the hundreds or thousands of years of radiation predicted by nuclear scientists, in fact, vegetation began growing within a month after the bombing, and the Japanese people began rebuilding almost immediately. Some nuclear physicists even claim nuclear weaponry fraudulent based solely on the technical impossibilities of fission material not to be incinerated before triggering the necessary chain reaction. Top nuclear physicist Galen Winsor explains how nuclear power plants are essentially just steam plants and nothing but the most expensive and effective way to boil water. He completely blows the lid off the idea of nuclear meltdown or nuclear waste, and even eats a good portion of live radioactive waste on camera which he claims to have been doing for years His professional opinion is that fear of nuclear radiation has been greatly exaggerated to scare people and so a few powerful organizations can maintain total control of the world's most valuable energy resource. Even the government teaching school-children to hide under their desks just to induce fear and funnel black tax money into a fake Cold War arms race as big and deceptive as the fake Space Race.

With regards to the Anti Semite Franklin Ryckyaert - rlThis Nuclear Physisist Galem Winsorrl urines all over his chips.

Adios

I'm interested in how these firebombing campaigns were done with one plane in one minute, as opposed to hundreds of squadrons of bombers dropping hundreds of thousands of incendiary bombs over several days.

Haha.

His stuff is gold.

If there was an award for believing the most gullible guff while maintaining nearly everyone else is wrong, he'd be Premier league.

Has anyone complied a list of his absurdities yet?

I think he's collecting conspiracies.

I can't wait to hear his explanation of Chernobyl and how the fallout of the last 30 years has merely been 'fake'.

In the book Vatican Assassins by Eric Jon Phelps (a non-fiction book about The history of the Jesuits) it is suggested that the bombs used on Japan in WWII were actually placed on the ground beforehand and exploded there. The US bombers having dropped dummy bombs. The reason being that the technology for dropping a-bombs from altitude wasn't developed at that time. This would mean that they'd have to have had cooperation with elements in the Japanese government to place (or construct) the real bombs on the ground ahead of time.

Before you get carried away with your ideas that only so-called nukes can create mushroom clouds I must remind you that conventional bombs detonated at ground level will generate the characteristic mushroom cloud. As the ground level bomb explodes it grows into a big dome of expanding hot gasses. As this dome rises into the cooler upper air mass the air rushing in under the dome creates the mushroom top with curved edges representing the airflow. The stem is made up of the rising column of smoke and heat from the epicentre still fed by the hottest gasses at the point of detonation.

A high altitude blast negates these conditions by heating the air mass around it, above and below, uniformly. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were said to have been bombed with detonations at high altitude. The presence of a mushroom cloud for those exposes the hoax.

With regards to Chernobyl.

Fallacy #1[i Chernobyl [/ias if some magical incantation to make sceptics go away.[i A prime piece of hoax maintenance.[/i

Fallacy #5: It is a dishonour to the dead at Chernobyl to doubt the claims of commercially viable nuclear energy production.
Truth: Its really no worse than questioning the causes of any other deaths said to have been caused by an explosion anywhere else in the world. Explosion Tragedies unfortunately happen Blame the deception perception.

We can settle this no problem..ask the local nuclear power station if you can go and clean the nuclear pile or dump load. Take The Butcher with you, I'm not only bored with his stalking, attempted derailing tactics and dribbling rantings, but you can put him in the pile by proxy. Hahahahaha