Just out of curiosity ... why is it unbiblical and un-Christian?
What did Jesus have to say on the subject?

My favourite part of Genesis is where God creates the objects that emit light three days after he creates light.

Apparently, God is not very bright.

Steady fella, steady ... evolution is heresy, didn't you know that?

The feminists on here might like this one


One day, Eve was walking in the garden with the Lord. She said, "Lord, the garden is wonderful, and the animals and birds provide such joy, but I am still lonely sometimes."

"No problem!" the Lord replied. "I will make you a man for a companion. He will desire to please you and to be with you. But I have to warn you, he won't be perfect. He'll have a difficult time understanding your feelings, will tend to think only of himself, and will stay out late with his bowling buddies."

"What's bowling?" Eve asked.

"Oh... never mind. I was just getting ahead of myself, sorry."

"That's OK. I think I can handle this 'man'," Eve replied.

"Great, I'll get right to it!" God said, and started grabbing some mud and shaping it.

Suddenly, the Lord stopped and said to Eve, "Oh, there's one other thing about this man I'm making for you."

"What's that?" asked Eve.

"You'll have to tell him he was here first."

It's their club, I suppose they can set the rules, but lets remove the charitable status of any organisation that refuses to abide by equal opportunities laws.

Why?



Haha, birds didn't evolve from dinosaurs. Birds and other flying animals were created on the 5th day.

Are you saying that the sun is the only source of light in the universe? And are you also saying that an omnipotent God cannot create light himself?

Please cover the basics before making snide remarks.

Actually, Jesus didn't provide much detail about his church. However he did hand over responsibilty to Peter (and to a lesser extent, Paul) and their God-breathed scriptures are crystal clear on the issue of female authority in church.

You mean those stories that took over two centuries to write down and have had many, many translations and rewrites over the centuries, the latest being written many centuries ago to fit in with what an English king wanted, those god breathed scriptures? No more than a giant game of Chinese whispers and spin.

Well if today you had met both a talking snake who told you to eat an apple, and a T-rex which story would you think you would try and save for posterity? A snake interested in you getting your five a day, or a massive carnivorous killing machine far beyond the scale of anything alive today?

What about a Pterosaur?

Marriage, safe with the theists...

You can have a look at the many codexes for youself if you so wish. Apart from the end of Mark you will find very few discrepancies.

Doesn't really tie-in with the picture painted above

You've made a massive error and you don't even know it because you've never read the scriptures.

Before the fall of man, all dinosaurs were herbivores.

Please go and read a Bible before asking any more silly questions



What about them?

No. That's why I said 'objects' and not 'object'.



I'm saying that an omnipotent god wouldn't be stupid enough to create light, then decide three days later that he's going to create the things that will forever more be the source of all light and do away with the thing that was emitting the light for the first three days.

Bless.