Again you do not understand the issue.

If it was a war in NI Loughall was legitimate , if it was a law and order issue then it was not. Republicans accept this. They just do not accept the hypocrisy of British politicians.

I love reading Durham Giant's nonsense. Whenever I feel a twinge of guilt about the behaviour of some individuals in the British Army, as soon as I get to the end of his first paragraph, all doubts are gone.

Here we have a guy born and brought up in England, and about as Irish as my last bowel movement, happily regurgitating a mixture of cut and pasted Wiki extracts and Republican nonsense as told to him by his inebriated Dad on a Friday night.

Then I remember, is this the same Durham Giant who was lead up the garden path a couple of seasons ago on the Virtual terrace page, when he fell hook line and sinker for the Classic Bailey thread?

I believe it is!

and when you cannot deal with the arguements you resort to insults. Classic plastic Limey. Get back to your comics and drawing with crayons. Leave the debates to the adults.

This is your rebuttal? Pathetic!

As government leaders, policy makers and the actual commanders of their armed forces, of course they were. The Queen is none of those. She's simply a figurehead. Attacking the Queen wouldn't be an act of war, it would just be an attack intended to cause nothing but fear and distress - that's known as terrorism.

And banging on about 'legitimate targets' is pretty irrelevant when they thought nothing of blowing up innocent people in any number of 'illegitimate' attacks. You can't ignore those crimes and support the attacks you decide you approve of according to your f*cked up moral compass.

Oh and I must have missed the bit where war was declared by both sides.


Oh no, of course not, nowt to do with being trendy100 stitches in my face being stabbed twice and shot at suggests i was a bit more than trendy and right on. '"