It would be amusing if it weren't so tragic, to see the Brexiteers desperately claiming that each new example of capital flight has nothing to do with Brexit - the list of companies continues to grow, and the list of gobe experts spinning it into something else grows in tandem, with Boris Johnson and JRM recently on record as knowing more about the operation of particular businesses than the people actually running them. It's madness.

Meanwhile, I've just been to the chemist for some meds that I take regularly, to be told that they're not available at the moment; supply chain disruption due to Brexit. Yay - take back control, but not of managing your own chronic symptoms.

I refer the honourable member for Wakefield to my reply above.

supply chain disruptions? I very much doubt it.

Yeah - the pharmacist is a reyt lying basterd; it's project fear innit.

so, we haven't left the EU yet, what "supply chain" issues are there?

I didn't ask him for a full report, but I suspect rlthisrl explains a lot; you won't like it though, it's a report based on the words of someone who actually knows what they're talking about.

For my part, I hope Boris Johnson takes over the running of my pharmacy - he's sure to be able to fix it.

Hugh Pym, a "journalist" with no agenda at all, honest.

I saw that one coming.

How about:



Another one of those pesky experts, peddling lies based on things he actually knows?

based on his agenda, perhaps.

This article is more up MGarbutt1986's street. You've got to tell him what he wants to hear from his 'trusted' sources. https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/0 ... s-nhs-ceo/ But just take note of the main headline and the sub-heading. The former says 'will not', the latter says 'should not'. So, which is it?

This article is more up MGarbutt1986's street. You've got to tell him what he wants to hear from his 'trusted' sources. https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/0 ... s-nhs-ceo/ But just take note of the main headline and the sub-heading. The former says 'will not', the latter says 'should not'. So, which is it?

Yes, his agenda of being in charge of procuring medicines for the NHS, you ing loon.

So, good old Donald Tusk has riled a few today with his "special place in hell" comment. Nice to see the delightful Andrea Leadsom & Sammy Wilson from the Ransomer Party frothing with anger.

I suggest they forgo the archaic concept of hell & concentrate more on May's air miles folly.

Digressing a little, I caught a report on T.V. last night about how many asylum seekers have been re-located to northern towns as it much cheaper. It claimed that there should be no more than one in two hundred people, but in parts of Barnsley it was one to nearer eighty odd people. The programme then waxed lyrically how Barnsley voted by 60 / 40 to leave, now, I totally understand peoples despondency at the situation, but once again - what has this got to do with the E.U?

When are people going to wake up, it's our own governments that are shafting us, jeez......

Yeah and 4/5 years ago I had the same problem with them not being available at the moment....or are we pretending that everything was perfect pre Brexit.

Candesartan seems to be in short supply everywhere - doubt very much its to do with Brexit as there are multiple manufacturers in the UK

Snowflakes getting all melty again; what he actually said was there would be a special place in hell for those who "promoted Brexit without even a sketch of a plan of how to carry it safely." He's absolutely right - I guess if you're one of those people to whom he refers, the truth hurts.