She might not have married in church?

That is not sinful per se.

My view of civil, non-Christian marriages is that at least they are doing the right thing the wrong way.

Same-sex marriage is doing the wrong thing the wrong way.

I'm giving up. You're a hater and haters hate.

I don't hate anyone.

One involves acts which take place between consenting adults which affect nobody else and the other two involve doing clear harm against another individual who has not given their consent be be raped or murdered.

Your particular religious doctrine may not recognise the difference, however in a tolerent modern society such as the UK most people can clearly see the difference between acts taking place consisting of consenting adults which do no harm to anyone else and acts which cause harm to others. If your religious doctrine can not distinguish between the two then so much for your religious doctrine.

Science is fact. The Bible is just a book written many, many years ago that needs to change through time but cannot therefore, to me, it's a fairytale just like Hansel and Gretel and many other books.

Kirkstaller is not a troll, i've seen his/her views before.

He's trying to use the old scripture v science debate all over again, what he means is he will only accept science when it agrees with scripture.

I only hope he/she doesn't eat seafood.

Science will never agree with scripture so he's wasting his time.

And that's the point.

That way their pointless, bigoted book can always be justified for them.

I agree with you.

Please don't dismiss people with views like this as trolls, they are much more seditious than that.