I drove my friend to a hospital in London a fair few years back, she was registered disabled and had the diabled parking card prominantly on display. There were no parking places anywhere so we parked on yellow lines as she is allowed to do so up to 3 hours and was not obstructing any access etc.
Came back 1.5 hours later and there was a ticket on the screen..It was a bast'd to get it overturned I can tell you..she was so stressed about the whole episode at the time..
saying that London is a whole world of shat for parking ticket shenanigans..

"Are you due a refund for a parking fine?"

No because I am not thick enough to put myself in that position of parking illegally and I have a watch and can tell the time!

I've received two fines which were both illegally issued. Unfortunately, the process is designed to make it so difficult to actually appeal a fine that most people will simply accept the discount offered to make the matter go away. It's only because I'm so bloody minded that I got them overturned.

One of those tickets took months and needed me to take the time to attend a hearing with the independent adjudicator, who was not at all complimentary about the conduct of the council. Not once during the process did the council apologise for wasting mine and taxpayers time. I still don't think they've addressed the issues that my appeal was allowed on and yet, they're still issuing tickets.

It's interesting how Leaguefan directs his comments at drivers who've done nothing wrong, rather than council officials failing to do something that they should know how to do - and then failing to spot for six years. Actually, it's not interesting in the slightest.

Yep that's the same with my experience. Every step along the way is designed (or appears to be) to make you just say "oh sod it" and pay the fine. It was only because I was absolutely 100% certain that I was right and they were wrong (and I was in an awkward mood) that I decided to challenge it and go through all the hassle.

In my case the road markings and signs weren't correct or the ticket was wrongly issued, I never actually received a reason as to why the ticket was issued in the first place, so as according to the markings and signs I'd parked correctly when I got back to my car and saw the ticket I took pictures with my phone to prove it. So fortunately I didn't have to go to a hearing but it still took months of correspondence with the Council amongst which were threats of legal action and debt collectors from them. Until eventually it must've reached someone with some authority and they finally gave in and accepted I was right.

If I'd been in the wrong I'd have paid it, but I wasn't as I check the road markings and signs wherever I park. As I was 100% convinced I was right, and had the pictures to back it up, I didn't see why I should pay.
A few months later the road markings were changed to what they are now on St Michael's Lane, which is presumably what they wanted it to be like back when they fined me.


As another point that's sort of relevant to this issue, City of York Council recently completely cocked up a traffic scheme in the city whereby they closed Lendal Bridge to all but buses and cycles during certain times. They put up cameras and started fining everyone who contravened those times. However they didn't put up proper signs or road markings so it was deemed illegal and they now owe everyone they fined.

So let's not pretend every single instance where fines are issued is correct or the fault of careless/arrogant drivers. Especially when fines (especially parking fines) are generally now issued by private companies with poorly paid workers on crap conditions working to targets.

And they don't pay the money back unless you apply for it.
Basically because they want to pay the minimum for what was their mistake.
So some people who were wrongly fined still ended up paying because in ignorance not everyone would apply ... seems fair.

In the same way that York City Council levied fines totalling £1.3million over an eight month period in 2013 for using Lendal Bridge when they arbitrarily decided they should only to be told by the traffic ajudicator that they had no legal grounds to do so - they now have to refund the money but despite the fact that they were all levied on motoristswho were traced via the dvla, the council decided that the 56000 people would have to apply for a refund, whats the betting that they dont give all the money back after comitting an illegal act to levy it ?

That's the case I was thinking about as I wrote it.
They should be made to pay it all back.

If I park on a council owned car park I will pay the fee. If it's privately owned and you don't have to get passed a barrier then I won't pay a penny. I've recieved numerous requests for money in the past and just ignored them. Usually taking an individual to court will cost these parking companies far more than the so called 'penalty' that they charge. They operate in hope that their strongly worded letter will scare people into believing that they have to pay up.

Ignoring the tickets is no longer the recommended practice in England due to a law change.

rlhttp://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/forumdisplay.php?f

parking in supermarkets with time limits on their car park is another where they try to 'fine' you but have no leverage in law to force you to do so, though I'm sure plenty cough up. Managed to park almost indefinately when going to Camden markets and some shows round there

I'm intrigued. What makes you think it's acceptable to park as and when you please on someone's land?

I'm intrigued. What makes you think it's acceptable to park as and when you please on someone's land?

I take issue with private companies issuing £100 invoices for a 2 min overstay as much as anyone, but I've no issue with someone trying to operate a legitimate pay and display.

Is this in addition to pee pee aye?

Premium rlQuartz Worktopsrl are durable, moisture-resistant, available at trade prices, offer nationwide fitting, and come with a 25-year warranty, making them perfect for kitchens and bathrooms.