Wonder if the Spitter was Labour or Tory? Young or Old?
Was the lady who has died that was spat at Labour or Tory? A Leftie who just wants a Nanny State
Did she vote Leave or Remain?

Victoria Station worker dies with coronavirus after being spat at
A ticket office worker at London's Victoria Station has died with coronavirus after being spat at while on duty.
Belly Mujinga, 47, was on the station concourse in March when a member of the public claiming to have Covid-19 spat and coughed at her and a colleague, the Transport Salaried Staffs Association (TSSA) said. Within days of the assault, both women fell ill with the virus.

Whilst at the same time :-
A key worker has said that social distancing was “impossible to maintain” on his tube journey to work on Tuesday morning.
Terry McCarthy, 37, a supermarket store manager, took a photo at Canada Water at 7am and shared it to Twitter with the caption: "And they try to tell us the tube is at 5 per cent capacity! This is dangerous and putting lives at risk!”
He said that his place of work was too far away to walk or cycle to.
Both the platform and the train were busier than what it has been the last few weeks.
There were too many people in the carriage and social distancing was impossible to maintain

And at the same time :-
BREAKING:
The number of deaths in the UK involving coronavirus has passed 40,000, analysis of officials statistics shows.
And
Covid-19 deaths 24% higher in England as care home fatalities soar
Covid-19 deaths in England were 24 per cent higher than previously reported, according to new data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

I was accused earlier of dismissing people opinions based on who they are, or who their politics aligned with.
Nothing could be further from the truth

I believe the Furlough scheme if anything was too generous and the government should have looked at maybe limiting that (From someone who has 3 people furloughed in the household - albeit 1 has a main job that can carry on as normal). And also the business relief program was over generous in some instances.
For example and I mentioned Bowling in another post, I run/am director of a Cricket/bowling/social club and we qualified for the small grant of 10k - We will need that and that's fantastic and I would say pitched at the right level. I know of 2 Bowling greens that are just that, a Green, with no clubhouse/staff etc. with very little income but then again very little Overheads, and somehow they qualify for the same 10k. That will last them 10years!!!
What I do believe however is that a lot of the trumpeting about the "Success" the government had achieved was based on those kinds of "Generous" Financial policies and it was a smokescreen for a lot of their mistakes made 6/8 weeks earlier in not taking this threat seriously enough and all that came with it over the next 6/8 weeks.

The announcement Sunday was riddled with issues, my own friend said he thought it was "easy to understand" and then within the next 5mins both if us asked numerous questions that we had no idea on - some of that was resolved yesterday, a lot hasn't.

Why was there such a rush to get this out Sunday night, with all the holes in it, why wasn't there earlier and better communication with Devolved governments? etc.

I understand that people voted for Boris for a variety of reasons
Get Brexit done.
Corbyn is a Communist
etc.

There are as many people on that side of the fence blindly defending the government due to their previous alignment on the above and other issues to "Prove" they were right to vote Boris.

That's fine
But don't be surprised, just as if the shoe was on the other foot, of others quite rightly IMO questions things when they believe things have been done incorrectly/badly.

On Channel 4 news last night they had the boss of the biggest care home group in the UK with a huge number of deaths - he was asked by the Murthy how many of their staff and customers had been tested he said 3,000 and they were working to get more but operationally this is difficult!! and then he was asked about PPE, his response was "we have and excellent procurement team, we saw this coming and we have not had any issues in respect of PPE" at which point G-Murthy closed down the interview, obviously didn't give him the ammunition he needed. Perhaps the Labour MP sacked for telling lies about PPE volunteered for this group?

It does beg the question why more testing is not being done - My company has Critical supplier status - we had two guys showed symptoms on Wednesday last week, we booked a test for both Thursday, they were tested Friday - negative results Monday. I cannot understand why all care home staff/customers have not been tested - it should be mandatory.

You are confusing now with the first few weeks when despite what Johnson might say there was clearly a problem particularly when they blatantly ignored care homes because they did not believe the virus would be a problem.
I would suggest Johnson tries to avoid any further confrontation with the Labour leader who is clearly nailing his bafoonery with facts every time they face each other.

Johnson, who is great at one liners and put downs, has never been strong on detail of anything - the cockney term is "blagger".
If Starmer or anyone else actually gets enough chances to pin him down, he will find more holes than the proverbial sieve.

You have to say that Johnson has done well to get the top job, with his likeable oaf act but, time will definitely catch him and when there is ever any proper scrutiny, he will be found wanting.
Mind you, he will very quickly send one of his puppets in to take the bullets, it's what he does.

The current PMQs format is showing him to be the make it up on the spot blagger that he really is. Without his braying mob, to jeer over the bluff and bluster, he's got absolutely nowhere to hide. Gone is the cocksure, swashbuckling, 'bring it on' attitude. He's been reduced to a sitting duck. The following two pictures sum him up, for me.

Its the one bonus of being the top man - someone takes the bullet for you. Johnson has served his purpose for the Tories, he killed the hard left Labour Corbynites in one night - never to be seen again. I would not be surprised if he steps down through ill health and allows Sunak to take over. He will certainly give Starmer a run intellectually/gravitas wise a run for his money.

One of the problems the Tories made and it was probably a left over from the GE - they put too many eggs in the NHS basket at the cost of everything. It worked the NHS coped really well sadly the care sector suffered.

Do you think that Sunak will still be a front bench politician when the Government have to balance the books.
All that he's done so far is to open the country's wallet and boy, has he opened it.

Spending at a rate never witnessed in peace time.

If he gets through this one, with borrowing under control, he will probably be made king, never mind Prime Minister.
It's far more likely than Boris will use him as a fall guy and tell the country how he "trusted him to get us through this", as he eases him aside for yet another one of his cronies.

I was always told that it's easy to spend money and that anyone could do it, much more difficult to achieve the same results on a budget and he's certainly not sticking to any budget but, there will be a day of reckoning at some point and then we will see, not only how good the Chancellor is but, also how good Boris is under severe fiscal pressure and most importantly, there wont be the get out clause of the last 10+ years, where every difficult decision was blamed on Labour - I'm looking forward to it.

The coronavirus has given them an excuse for many many years financially - gullible lot us Brits, especially when there is no alternative in sight

Gullibility only lasts as long as it does not effect a person’s finances, when they realise that many will be paying more and working until they are 70 the lies of Johnson will quickly start to wear thin and scrutiny will increase. We all know he is not a big fan of being scrutinised or questioned without a large fridge about.