Most modern flat-earthers are from the creationist christian camp, so they seek literal interpretation of the bible. This is fine but everything we've learned about reality, the bible has got spectacularly wrong. They have to stick to the basic tenets of their thinking that the earth is flat, so everything that may counter that argument has to be explained away in a way that best fits their own narrative. Anything in space is explained away in bizarre fashion, and space agencies around the world all have to be fakes. Satellites don't exist. The moon and sun are light sources and flat (Even though you can prove they're not) the list goes on and on. The lies and deliberate ignorance becomes staggering and they have no problem linking all these ridiculous ideas into one giant incoherent mess that they see as 'the truth' and the rest of us marvel at the lunacy.

I was replying to someone else, but I'm touched by your obsessive stalking. It wasn't me who brought up your flat earth belief it was you. Bandgeekmafia was asking about flat earthers as a group not Flat Stanley as an individual, and I replied to him referring to the group, not you. You could have replied to him about his question but resorted to more Ad Hom at me.

I'm sorry you feel so insecure.

Bandgeekmafia you can ignore Flat Stan, he is a true one off delusional and spends half his time trolling anyway. I did once ask him why, if the Earth is flat, the Moon looks upside down to a person in Australia. He still hasn't recovered from trying to figure that one out, but chooses to instead totally ignore such basic debunks, as they don't compute with his religious delusions.

If he wasn't trolling (the jury remains out) then he also seems to believe that there are no Sky / TV satellites, and that he receives all the full range of subscription Sky channels for free through his dish which according to him picks up some mysterious analogue terrestrial signals from somewhere. No dishes point to space, he says they all point to nearby towers. Yes, I know.

And there are no ISS and no satellites. Yes, I have pointed out that he can go out any clear night and watch hundreds of them for himself but he's scared to look as it wouldn't fit his delusions to see for himself.

Oh and yes, Antarctica doesn't exist, the edge of the Earth is bounded by a huge impenetrable ice wall, and flights claiming to fly that way never actually take off.

PS and indeed yes he does apparently believe that there is no ISS, it is a "holograph". This is transmitted in real time, from lord knows how many thousands of networked worldwide projectors that nobody has ever seen and all to fake a brightly glowing perfect image of the ISS 24/7 at any point on the Earth where its orbit happens to take it. Oh, and this here "holograph" is also a solid object in that when it crosses the face of the Sun or the Moon it's silhouette can be seen. Some holograph!

Poor Stan.

Are there White Walkers at this Ice Wall? I like a good conspiracy theory but the Flat Earth one just seems a bit far-fetched.

For a place no-one is allowed, it's a bit odd that you can even book a place on an expedition to ski to the South Pole itself.

Here's a link, at the time of posting there is one place left. Cost US$128,000.

.[/sizesed off about that?

[i

Quote: Ferocious Aardvark " You know you eventually posted some utter nonsense about a lamp in a room, it was real headscratching drivel, when challenged on that particular gem, even you had no clue WTF you were saying. It did raise a good laugh, but was arrant nonsense. See this is you trollingN*O*B*O*D*Y would be as stupid as to believe you're being serious.
Wait ... you now claim that you get Channels via an internet server! Do you even know what you mean from one minute to the next? Stan, we can all watch pirated content over the internet if we want to, poor lad.

Well done again for claiming that Byrd travelled "internally", you don't seem to grasp that he couldn't actually travel internally unless there was somewhere internal to travel to, but then I suppose it is hard to keep up with such grand delusions and you're bound to make such mistakes.

But, well done you for realising that when a person does venture into Antarctica, they'd be travelling "inland". As of course they would, seeing as it's at the south end of a globe. It would be good if you were somehow able to hang on to this moment of clarity. '"

[/i
[iSee this clown cannot debate without vitriolic Ad Hom abuse.. See my pearls of answers really get your cognitive dissonance super charging hence the keyboard flex and vex. We've been over and over these arguments before so why are you trolling and instigating trouble with your rather embarrassingly tirades. Now the Moon analogy again i explained and your still don't/won't/can't grasp the perspective because you're so vexed and closed minded to even contemplate it just like Dr Judy Wood book you criticise blindly before outweighing factual evidence. Here's an idiots guide to rlMoon Perspectiverl to make you understand...

With regards to my TV package, again you can't seem to grasp this fact. Theres hundreds of thousands of folk who have this subscription. Its not illegal and it certainly not piracy. Are you jealous your vexed reply suggests so. Satellites dishes are nothing more than an analogue glorified aerial period.

Antarctica... Nobody yes nobody is allowed at the supposed geographical South Pole, So they have an imitation glass sphere'd ball object at a private location which isn't the real so called geographical south pole. Theres only so far you can venture in. Treaty regulations. Hard luck.you should research a bit harder.

Now this what i find hilarious. CGI alert. The fake Blue Marble which is CGI, wheres the star constellations in the background....