Ah right, haven't played it but been looking to get it but still being £25 I might just wait for the updated one this year.

There will be no standalone cash in game for Euro 2012 from EA this year. Instead it will be a dlc add on for FIFA 12 priced at £15. Might actually purchase FIFA now, Sainsburys are selling it for £25! www.thesixthaxis.com/2012/03/29/ ... main-game/

There will be no standalone cash in game for Euro 2012 from EA this year. Instead it will be a dlc add on for FIFA 12 priced at £15. Might actually purchase FIFA now, Sainsburys are selling it for £25! www.thesixthaxis.com/2012/03/29/ ... main-game/

Rumours are surfacing about the possibility of the next gen consoles banning used games from being played on them, Nothing been confirmed yet but I think it would be a bad move. It would certainly put me of buying a next gen console. Nothing confirmed yet mind and I could only see it leading to more demand for console hacks and illegal game pirating.

thoughts?

I am against it myself, causes more problems than it solves

But then again they are getting very militant about pirating, Sony just pulled some games from it's online store as they have exploits that allow you to install homebrew on the vita, even if you have already bought it then you cant download it anymore.

They are unbelievably busy on the Olympics game. How the hell do you program fog and driving rain into a diving competition?

I'm interested to see how they would enforce that on consoles with no internet connection.

Just had a go on the new Tiger Woods 13 demo. It appears EA's idea of keeping this franchise fresh is to keep messing with the controls every year.

Well that itself leads to another another rumour. Namely that the next gen consoles will not turn on without a working internet connection and that the 'desktop' will not be console based, but cloud based.

What have they been messing around with this time?

anybody played portal 2?

noticed it going cheap in game and wondered if its worth £10?

Where is it £10? Wouldn't mind picking up a copy of that myself.

So I've just finished ME 3 and I'm still undecided. I found it very difficult to get the critisism from people about the ending out of mind. However maybe that is the reason I don't understand what the controversy is about it?

Overall I loved the game. I do wish they'd have delayed the release a few months so some of the bugs could be fixed but on the whole there're some really stunning parts to this game, particulary the parts set on Earth.

Actually having gone through the ending a couple of times I now realise why everyone seems to be so pi55ed off with the ending. Its almost as if the ending was just put there to just get the game out. There're so many holes in the ending it seems a totally new writing team took over for the last 30 minutes.

*Spoiler time*

How can the mass relays be destroyed? In the DLC for ME2 it was pinted out that destroying a mass relay would destroy solar systems. Yet this doesn't happen when they all get desyroyed. Also how does everyone who was fighting the battle around Earth get home?

No clue is given to what happens after the battle except the Normandy crsh lands on some random planet. How did the Normandy get there if the Mass relays were destroyed?

There's a few more I've spotted but what really anoys me is that unlike the rest of ME 3 the choices you make in the previous games don't seem to matter as all the endings are pretty much identical. I know there's an ending where sheppard lives but even that is only a couple of seconds added on.

Its a shame because 99% of this game (and the other 2 games to be fair) is brilliant but its one of the worst written endings I've ever come accross in any form of media.

Without doubt the best game of the last 12 months. It's an absolute masterpiece. Only game I've ever bothered getting the 1000GS for.