Was he reinvestigated for the first omission yes because he had not told the investigator the whole truth.
Was the Conservative party investigated for the actions they took defending de Pfeffel YES
The second investigation was provided with evidence that was released to the public yesterday which immediately raised additional questions regarding his actions.
I cannot make it much simpler but you keep denying the facts he lied and continues to do so and I wonder other than you how many on here think you do not defend his actions.

The only reason I visit the sin bin these days is to read SP’s daily beat down on chissitt. It’s hilarious

I don’t know if he is actually this stupid or just trying to be obnoxious to cover his stupidity.

Labour mayor of Liverpool suspended due to police investigation of alleged fraud. Unite Union under investigation as to building a conference in Birmingham. Massive cost overrun.

Oh dear Stephie nothing alters same old same old, 1/10, 0/10 for content, 0/10 for effort, and 1/10 for predictability

The only reason your on the sin bin is it's the only board your not banned on, apart from the VT where everybody is bored to tears with your old material you even managed to kill off the saints board, here's an idea, why don't you try and re invent yourself again, at least it will give us something to work out between your first and second post who you are, the WarringtonWolve 69 isn't working for you I'm afraid

How American is that! .......add in Yanks just don't have a sense of humour.

If he's guilty of fraud, then the authorities should deal with him, end of.
The overspend argument could be really interesting, it may be wise not to look at HS2 or pretty much any major project, they rarely come in under budget ?

As a sub contractor I am well aware of cost overruns. I agree also that most major projects always finish up over budget. However it’s the placing of contracts on the conference that is under investigation. Also the companies involved are linked to certain trade Union leaders.
My point is dodgy deals aren’t exclusive to the Tory party.. Almost forgot Peter Mandelson ,seem to remember him mixed up in some dubious loans.

It's an interesting one.
NOBODY should be above the law and if there are underhand deals or "dodgy" favouritism going on then, those involved should be brought to account.
Sadly, this doesn't seem to apply if you are part of the current government or their friends and family.

Who is me?

Mandelson wasn't taking money from a donor. And he resigned.

And now there's talk for a £2k pay rise for MP's.

It probably won’t be a popular opinion, but if it was accompanied by better policed expenses system, I’d be okay with more than that. That’s probably only inflation.

As per normal you misread my posting. Under no circumstances am I defending the Tory government, they are a pretty shabby bunch. Mandelson in fact resigned on 2 occasions, then obviously went on to make a fortune in the EU. Likewise with Blair the warmongering specimen. I am merely making the obvious point that the tories haven’t got exclusive rights to sleaze .
Any thoughts on Ian Lavery mp ? . I won’t venture down the road of how many labour politicians seem to end up the wrong side of the law. Step forward Claudia Webb and take a bow. Anyway I thought you would be rejoicing all this debacle should lead to a labour victory at the next election .