I do know some stations couldn't cope with it.

They could do what they used to do on some Inverness bound services when you sat in carriage A to get off at B station and C carriage to get off at D station to allow the carriages needed to open doors at the stations. They also dropped two carriages off at Perth to go onwards to Aberdeen and picked up another two that had come from elsewhere. Quite organised really for Scotrail.

It does rely on everyone to listen and read though. The numpties heading in the wrong direction having just went into any carriage whatsoever (and ignored the "If you are going to X get off this train NOW" messages) weren't best pleased.

See that's where it all falls down.

I'd bet they'd only make that mistake once though. I'd lay money that the guy on the train when I was visiting Fi who ended up in Inver instead of Aberdeen has never done it since

Can't you two get a room?

Oh hang on.........

Works fine on the Waterloo to Poole service.
If you want to get off at, say, Farnborough, you need to board one of the first eight (yes, eight, there are actually twelve, count 'em) coaches.

The train guard/ticket bloke/conductor/whatevertheycallem advises people if they are in the wrong coach.

Back to the topic.
Why is Osborne doing this?

It's a lame attempt at stimulating the economy.
Maybe it's his Plan B.
If it is, it's pretty pathetic.

Because he likes rich people? Because he'd like to create a two-tier society where the 'haves' have everything as easy as possible and the 'have nots' can go and screw themselves? Because he's an oily, chinless tw[ia[/it with all the appeal of a bag of dog turds? All of the above?

I think its much simpler than that, I think its an idea to float in the media to see if there is a positive or negative reaction to it, I think its all been generated by one or more of the large road construction companies lobbying for any desperate way to find some future projects because at the moment there is nothing at all on the horizon for them except for maintenance.

You can imagine the CEO of one of those companies planting the seed of an idea that they will pay for the roads if they can benefit from the tolls, no hard facts or figures yet just some wishful thinking that will probably result in those companies requiring a subsidy or underwriting of such a mammoth project so that they themselves are not exposed to ruin, and then the whole thing will quietly fade from memory.

I can just imagine all the tweets from the Peregrines and Tarquins, when they find that progress down their privately-funded turnpike has been slowed by some Albanian lorry driver in front. Some use ANPR and automatic charging will be then

i.e. A small, late stimulus with the appearance of no taxpayers money going into it (ignoring the fact that same taxpayers will have to pay a toll later on).
We've been here before, with the Isle of Skye road bridge.
No change in Conservative thinking there then ... same old, same old.

Brilliant idea,how would you get fuel ,food ,goods to the service stations?Of course diverting goods traffic to A roads is a fantastic idea.Surprised nobody has thought of it.