There are differences in the types of jobs between the two sectors and some sectors have higher likelihoods of sickness than others.
On average, women have more sickness absence than men and the public sector employs a higher proportion of female workers.
The sickness rates only counts someone as sick if they work fewer hours than contracted for. It would exclude someone who is sick and makes up for the lost hours at a later point in the week. It is possible that individuals in smaller workforces are under more pressure to make up any lost hours and these workforces are more prominent in the private sector.
Individuals within the private sector are also more likely to not be paid for a spell of sickness than individuals within the public sector.


No. It was caused by government incompetence in the awarding of a private contract.


I'm unsure which examples you're referring to.


I do wish you'd stop making things up. The most efficient car plant in Europe is represented by Unite.


Are you now saying that public sector bodies shouldn't adopt private sector practices?


No, in Germany the unions and the employers work together with mutual respect.


Lol.

Stress perhaps? Not least because of ill-informed judgmental cretins jerking their little knees orgasmically everytime the likes of Murdoch or Dacre's rags tell them that public service workers are lazy, hopeless etc etc  and, of course 'don't live in the real world'.

I have a neighbour who's a teacher, who has been having to deal with a suicidal pupil probably with (inherited) bipolar. Not remotely stressful, obviously. Bet you have that all the time, don't you, dearie?

Met a trading standards officer on Friday who, with diminishing resources ('cos it's a waste of taxpayers' money, obviously) tries to catch and stop rogue traders who are ripping off elderly people for thousands of pounds. Who cares, eh? Bet a private company could do it so much better – and make a profit!

Probation officers dealing with difficult cases, resources slashed and trying to do the frontline stuff instead of the paperwork. No stress there, since the outcomes of their work are meaningless.

Social workers – villified by rabid media if anything goes wrong (even when that same cretinous right-wing media gets it wrong – as with the Baby P case

Actually, it was caused by people holding your cretinous political ideology

Well, that explains the Murdoch press then. And banks. And business. And ...

See? They were just behaving like the private sector they've all been told to behave like.



Indeed, we could add to the list the lies of Sal. Or did you pluck that factually incorrect comment out of the air in hope?



After being told by the government of the day to become more market-oriented and chase viewing figures, it's clearly just doing what others do.



I have never suggested it was. You will find, however, that the scale of criminality (because that is what is being discussed, not a lack of ethics) does seem to be concentrated, to a [igargantuan[/i degree, in one company and one company alone.

You can probably get reading and comprehension lessons; Sal, even at your time in life they might help you. Go private – you'll be helping someone make a profit.



Oh yes, those Krauts know how to tug their little forelocks etc.

This from Mr "Real World" himself is just hilarious.

Was in Birmingham yesterday and saw all the various stalls and marches,by far the largest demo was Stop the War , the Badger Cull protestors were all a diverse /strange bunch -some dressed in combat gear others looked like Greenham Common leftovers and quite a few older matriach types. However the union stalls were forlorn just manned by a couple of reps , no one looking at all the literature and massed piles of placards . The general gist of which seemed to be a call for a general strike.
When i finaaly saw a march either Unison ,Unite or PBS(?) the band and police outnumbered those taking part.
Even the Tories looked dissapointed at the indifference

Why the need for unions when we have politicians? After all, it was politicians who were the first to fight for an end to child labour, equal rights for women in the workplace, health and safety regulations in dangerous industries such as mining, the minimum wage, the right to fair representation at work, the right to paid maternity, paternity and adoptive leave etc. etc.

But seriously, it's depressingly obvious the only thing several contributors to this discussion know about unions is what they've been told. Perhaps they should educate themselves on the history of the labour movement in Britain (including its achievements and defeats) instead of witlessly regurgitating the same baseless, uncorroborated nonsense that's been passed about ever since the thirties and fourties when corporations realised they could achieve greater successes against organised labour using carefully crafted PR (or propaganda) than with gangs of thugs wielding blackjacks.

or maybe, just maybe, people can talk of their own experiences?

my experiences of Unions are, largely, positive, but when you get some local rep who has an agenda (and no f'ng brain) you can't make any progress.

maybe Mintball can tell us which part of the public sector usually vote, on mass, for strikes, and then get double time to work the weekend as they deliver a statutory duty?

There's nothing wrong with conveying your personal experiences, provided they then aren't held as representative of the wider union movement whose actions, ideology and history you know little about.

you're making an assumption about my knowledge, based on what?

OK

Nothing to do with the fact that he is under investigation by his local police authority and IPCC then?

Jumping (with full pension) before he gets pushed...

Might just be something you've posted on this topic.

rlGMB and Nestlé – reaching agreements together.rl

I've seen both the good and bad side of unions. Bad, in terms of representing people who have deliberately chosen not to follow organisation rules but I've also seen others persuade guilty parties to admit their offences too so it's not that straightforward. Similarly, I've seen them defend innocent workers exceptionally well against belligerent managers who have a chip on their shoulder against somebody. I've seen them represent people who've been bullied, exploited, assaulted and harassed (both sexually and racially). Unions perform a very important activity in this society and without them we'd still all be living like it was Wigan Pier.

There's plenty who still wish we were.
Maybe they should read GO's book or be transported back in time to be a guest at Mr & Mrs Brookers lodgings.

Nice tripe, shame about the constant black thumbprint in the bread.

Which is arguably what many lawyers do in some cases. 3.9453125:5