I've just come across this article, here a former CIA, NSA agent Steve D Kelley speaks out regarding the St Bernardino False flag event. Steve's declares "expect a long line of more false flagged events . “The people that were on the scene and saw this happen also reported that three tall white men wearing black shirts, khaki pants and tanned combat boots were actually the shooters. The description is almost exactly what the gentlemen from Craft International, the mercenary organization that was involved in so many other false flags, actually look like. This seems to be their standard uniform,”
[url=http://presstv.com/Detail/2015/12/08/440834/Craft-International-mercenaries-San-Bernardino-shootingFULL ARTICLE AND VIDEO INTERVIEW CLICK[/url

I only replied to the previous post as is my right of reply, given the abuse you had aimed directly at me. I reply only for the same reason.

My post under reply contained - Vitriol: zero. Abuse: zero.


Not even a bit. I am simply pointing out one fact, that you were asked one simple question, which you won't answer.As for "geocentric debate", there IS no debate. The evidence is so overwhelming and the flatearthism so mind-numbingly unscientific and frankly mad, that it doesn't qualify for a "debate" any more than fairies at the bottom of the garden do.

You don't have any intention to debate, because you can't debate. You can't answer the simplest question.


You see, you can't just answer a straight question. You feel compelled to lace whatever drivel you write with antagonistic, sneering, nasty bullcrap. This says a lot about you.

Second, your bizarre "example" doesn't work. Wherever I sit in my room, the "semicircle" will always be pointing the same way. I will (obviously) se it from a different perspective, but its up-down orientation (obviously) doesn't change. At all. From anywhere in the room.

Anyway, the moon is a sphere, not a crescent. Make you room light a simple sphere. Paint a big red spot on the bottom. The spot will be at the bottom whether viewed from ANY part of the room.

In the case of the moon, it isn't a featureless sphere. It has well known topography. You can see, from anywhere on the planet, which part to you from where you are viewing looks "up". It isn't a question of illumination. What I see as the "top" of the moon would look to me as the "bottom" of the moon if I moved to Australia.


The thing is, you haven't. At all. Your example is very plain nonsense. Anyone can see through it in a second. Indeed, unless you are insane - which I doubt - you must very well know your "example" is nonsense. This is what my problem is with you. It strongly indicates that nothing you say is to be taken sremotely seriously. I mean, you cannot possibly actually believe that a room lamp will invert itself, or appear inverted, from different ends of a room. Can you?


Excuse me? You know i haven't a chance of answering questiuons you haven't asked? Are you now claiming to be psychic to add to the rest?

If that were true, you could always start your own thread and pose your stunning questions. If any were interesting, people might even choose to engage them.


...isn't fictitious at all. the nice thing is anyone can view it, clear sky permitting, from anywhere on the globe. That is your insurmountable problem.


One of us continually posts threats and abuse and one of us doesn't. Your problem is you actually can't stand calm, rational discussion.

Do catch the ISS on its numerous (predictable) passes this next few days. While you're at it, maybe you could plot its path on a map of your "flat earth" and explain how the feck it does that

Didn't he tell you that he lies down first?
He lies in one corner raises his head and looks at the light bulb.
It is hanging down, with Osram written on the bottom.

He then slides on his to the opposite corner without changing the direction of his feet until they hit the wall.
He now looks back. Hey presto, the bulb is hanging up with Osram written on the top.
Case proven.
He of course hasn't realised in effect he has turned upside down.
Oh silly him!
Shall I put a bank of three laughing emoticons?
It seems to be the trend.

I'know exactly what you've written, it'll be vitriolic CHILDISH nonsense. followed by a load of heliocentric bull even though i can't see it due to the beauty of the Foe button. Hmmm Bliss

If two people argue without actually reading each other's posts, are they even arguing at all?

Anyway, as any fule kno, it's turtles all the way down.

Poor Stan. He is upset cos he can't now see my posts. Maybe you could quote the last one for him. I wouldn't want him to miss out.

Can't see the sense in the foe button used in this way ... except maybe to an ostrich.

I was wisely advised to use the Foe button, you see when there's schizoid's about with multiple accounts goading me into arguments and there's actually folk conspiring in the background whom agree with some conspirittoral views but publically continue to poke the stick.





So from now on i'll only engage conversation with certain folk.There's obviously some weirdo's knocking about.

They are goading you because you are insane.
Worryingly, you are the type of person who ends up with a gun in their hands.
Mad, absolutely ing bonkers.

You've just been added to the foe list.

Is this STILL going on....?

Poor old flatearther doesn't have the brains to debate. He copies and pastes from the daily whacko. Insults people when they challenge him, then runs away like a coward.