Let me ask you a very important question -

[iHave you been filled with the Spirit?[/i

If not, then you are by no means qualified to judge the experience of those who have been born again in Christ. I know I have everlasting life through Jesus as well as I know that this computer in front of me exists.

You (naively) place your faith in science and rubbish the spiritual experience of others. However you fail to realise that you interpret science in the exact same way we experience God – you use your senses. You observe results. We observe Jesus. Scientific results can be replicated by others. The gifts of the Spirit can be replicated by others.

Can you tell me why your sensual responses to scientific evidence are any different to my sensual responses to God?



Can you explain the explosion of the early church? Why the Apostles agreed to forsake their lives if Jesus was not the Son of God? Why the tomb was empty? Where Jesus’ body went?




Evolution is not hard fact. Are you millions of years old? No? Well then you have no observed any kind of macro-evolution.

Your last comment is so lamentable it’s not worth replying to, though I will for the benefit of anyone with half a brain who is reading this.

If God is all-powerful, what makes you think that he needs to create a light source in order to create light?

You still don't get it.

We all deserve Hell. I deserve it as much as Hitchens. However I have the humility to see my wrongdoing and have placed my faith in Christ.

Hell is a terrible punishment. Jesus took our punishment for us, and remember how bad his death was! Therefore I would hate to see anyone go to Hell, including Hitchens.

Look, I dearly wish I could be with you when you pop your clogs, just to see the (metaphorical) look on your face when you realise that you've had your leg lifted. There is no heaven, there is no hell, there is nowhere for you to go because there will be no you. There will be some dead flesh & bones that will either be incinerated or left for carrion. Either way, you won't have to worry because you will be D E A D.

Occasionally, though I generally prefer beer.



Whether you [ithink[/i you know it or not, you are unable to prove it. Which is why I said your beliefs were lacking in any evidential foundation. If the only standard of proof we had to adhere to was "I believe it, therefore it's true", science would still be in the dark ages. And if that were the case, the computer in front of you wouldn't exist.



I most assuredly do not. Science does not require faith, for it has evidence.



Jesus Christ, is that the best argument you've got?

Scientific evidence is obtained through rigorous experiment and a stringent peer-review process. Hypotheses are tested and re-tested, refined and revised, before they are accepted as scientific theories. When new evidence comes to light that casts doubt upon a particular theory, scientists are willing to consider changing the theory if that evidence is proved to be reliable. Contrast this to your 'sensual responses to God'. You have decided [iwithout evidence[/i that God exists. You therefore view and interpret everything through this particular lens. No amount of evidence will ever persuade you that God does not exist.



It suited those who were in positions of authority at the time. That's an over simplification, but it's nearer the truth than 'the explosion of the early church proves Jesus'/God's existence'.



We have no proof that Jesus even existed, but if he did, I refer you back to my previous answer about the mental patients. People believe all manner of crazy sh*t.



It's a bloody story. We have no proof that Jesus existed, much less that he died, was placed in a tomb and then came back to life.



Yes, it is. There is not a single recognised scientist alive who doesn't accept the theory of evolution. It is fact.



I don't have to be millions of years old. Are the Police present at every murder? Or do they collect evidence in order to build up a picture of what happened? There is massive, overwhelming evidence to support evolution. You would have to be a total idiot to doubt it.



Gotcha. So he could create light without a light source, but he decided that the Sun, Moon and stars would look a lot prettier than plain old boring 'light' and 'dark'.

Just think about what you're posting - just a little bit.

Speak for yourself. I'm a good person. I don't go out of my way to hurt others - sometimes I'll even go out of my way to help them. I don't cheat on my wife and I'm a good father to our son. I'm (usually) honest, I don't murder or rape, and I pay my taxes. I'm not perfect - none of us are - but I certainly don't deserve Hell. Which is fortunate, because I won't be going there.

you are a first grade, bona-fide, nut job, someone in your family should have you sectioned for their own good, the princess didn't really sleep badly because of a pea, snow white didn't live with a bunch of vertically challenged miners and bo peep actually knew where all of her sheep where.

bat%4it lunacy, nothing more

and if I am wrong, I hope the hate-fuled vengeful "god" of yours strikes me down with a bolt of lightening.

Not very good at science, are you?

Talking to kirkstaller always reminds me of that episode of Family Guy where Meg finds religion. Towards the end of the episode Meg and Brian are at a book burning and someone says, "We must burn all the books that are harmful to Christianity."

First on the fire is 'On The Origin Of Species', second is 'A Brief History Of Time', third is 'Logic For First-Graders'.

Humorous, but you miss the point again.



There is ample evidence, such as the evidence I cited in my previous response.

Look, I’m sure even you will admit that I’m not a complete idiot. I am an educated man and make a good living for myself. Do you think I’ve not looked at Christianity from a critical standpoint? Of course I have, and I believe that the evidence points to a world which has been created.




You have faith in the men in white coats who tell you what to think.

You have faith in your senses to interpret scientific data correctly.



How is that any different to fellow Christians reviewing theology? Or exhibiting physical gifts of the Spirit?



So if evidence came along which demonstrated that evolution was wrong, you’d be the first to admit it? If so, why should I listen to you when you label it a fact?



No I haven’t.



No amount of evidence will persuade you that God exists. Even if he appeared before your eyes and performed miracles I’m sure you’d just blame it on some kind of psychological episode. You will never be satisfied. You are an enemy of God.



The people who witnessed Jesus’ resurrection were born again straight away. Their numbers multiplied astronomically. How do you explain this?



An overwhelming majority of scholars from numerous faiths (or even no faith) agree he existed.



Again, most scholars would disagree. You should then ask yourself why you accept or reject certain claims about his divinity.



Is that a fact just for today or for eternity? Real facts don’t chop and change depending on what way the wind is blowing.



There’s a notable lack of evidence of transition within species.



You fall short of God’s perfection, that is enough to condemn you. You are self-righteous. I am sorry to say you are destined for Hell whether you think you are a good person or not.

Please, embrace Jesus.

The Christian message is simple. Lead a good life and raise your children likewise. When you die you live on (via your children - who are half you genetically) if you've brought them up well they should do likewise and your "spirit" will live with them too. Over time if everyone does so, we create ' Heaven on Earth.' Hell can be seen on many housing estates were generations have taken a different vapproach.

So what about all the Jews, Jains, Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists and every other religion and even all those of no faith, who live a good life and instill goodness in their offspring?

What you have described is not a christian message, it is a humanist message

I didn't miss the point, the point was ridiculous and irrelevant, so I mocked it.



You have not yet cited a single thing that can be classed as 'evidence' by any reasonable interpretation of the word. All you have done is said, "I believe it, so it's true." I'm paraphrasing, but the message is the same.



Your posts would suggest otherwise.



You are unable to look at Christianity from a critical standpoint. If you did, you would cease to believe it. If you still believe it, you haven't looked at it critically. And certainly not logically.



No one tells me what to think. That's the beauty of being an atheist.



Scientific data is interpreted by many different people and reviewed until a consensus is reached. It does not rely on one person's say-so.



Really? You really need to ask that? How is empirical peer-reviewed evidence different to Christians reviewing their own book and finding it to be true? And you assert that you're [inot[/i a total idiot?



Yes. If the evidence was compelling enough and was subject to the normal verifications, of course.



Because no such evidence is likely to come along. Evolution is scientific fact. Every scientist thinks so. Anyone who doesn't think so either doesn't understand it, or wilfully ignores the evidence.



You have. You haven't presented one piece of evidence yet. Your 'relationship' with Jesus is not evidence. It's not even in the same ball park.



If God appeared before only my eyes and performed miracles, the most likely explanation would be a psychological episode. If, however, compelling physical evidence became available that confirmed his existence - evidence that was subjected to the usual rigorous [iscientific[/i testing - then of course I'd believe. The fact is, that not one shred of evidence exists.



If he existed, I most certainly would be.



I don't need to explain it because there's no evidence it actually happened.



They might agree, but they present no evidence.



3.83544921875:5